Unquestionably, with the genesis of new modern societies with individuals with divergent multicultural and economic backgrounds, a major problem or obstacle facing the populace as well as official authorities is formulating a policy, law, and legislation system whereby individuals will get the impression that should they commit crimes in any types such as moral issues, they have to be held responsible for that as well as expecting to be punished. Proponents of this notion, however, surmise that laws cannot be instrumental in the realm of moral issues due to the essence of morality. I tend to agree with the former one, though.
According to the former point of view, legislating laws and contriving a legal system have been believed to be conducive to prevent people, especially some of them who are more prone due to their impoverished class of society, their poverty-stricken life, from committing crimes. In addition, setting and implementing the legal system can be as a deterrent leverage for people who have the insatiable proclivity for striving more and more without having any need. Had the restrictive laws not been passed, the modern societies with their dramatical growing populations would be doomed to suffer from the consequential inexorable reverberations of crimes. Take Clinton-Lewinsky's sexual scandal as an example, sexual harassment, undoubtedly, is a moral issue, but had a plaintiff not had the opportunity to go to the court to retrieve her right, who knows how many innocent women would be sentenced to be a victim of sexual harassment, especially in confronting "powerful figures" who misuse their power and connection to satisfy their voracious sexual instincts. Hence, it seems that does not matter what the crime issue is either immorality or other areas passing laws can prohibit perpetrators from continuing their crimes.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, detractors of the efficacy of laws and legal system so as to tackle and eradicate moral issues in modern human beings' lives deem that the subatantial increasing rate of unstoppable moral issues in present-day societies is indicative of inefficacy of establishing some rules. This is mainly because moral principles cannot be molded by invoking laws and settling legal systems. As a case in point, illegally hunting animals--especially some of them who are on the verge (brink) of extinction, namely special tigers, grizzly bears, deer, and so on-- has not been stopped by strict and restrictive laws having been passed by official plenipotentiaries, inasmush as possessing guilty consciences cannot be ingrained into some ones' characteristics whose behaviors are wanting in morals. To illustrate, loopholes in laws are "an inevitable part" of the judicial system, and people whose behaviors are destitute of morals make a ploy to exploit these loopholes by nepotism or the inefficiency of the legal system. To combat the moral issues, moral sense should be instilled into children's minds and characteristics in view of the fact that infants as well as children are more open to be formed by moral standards by their family institutions in conjunction with schools, since with the passage of time their being impressible can be reduced. In this regard, some religious creeds can be helpful in prohibiting human beings' inclination to do wrong and immoral things which hurt others, in which situation no rules can be useful.
To sum up, weighing up the aforementioned explanations, I am of the opinion that it is undeniable that setting laws and inculcation moral principles into children's characteristics alike make a tremendous impact on resolving moral issues in modern societies. However, although I opine that stipulation of regulations has a more direct and restrictive impact on prohibiting people from neglecting morality, the role of inculcating conscience cannot be wholly overlooked.
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time. 16
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the 55
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time. 16
- Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moral behavior cannot be legislated. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...f the efficacy of laws and legal system so as to tackle and eradicate moral issues in mo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 789, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...me ones characteristics whose behaviors are wanting in morals. To illustrate, loopholes in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1450, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...eds can be helpful in prohibiting human beings inclination to do wrong and immoral thi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, still, well, as to, in addition, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3311.0 2235.4752809 148% => OK
No of words: 608.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44572368421 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25793059071 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523026315789 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 1043.1 704.065955056 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.558123163 60.3974514979 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 206.9375 118.986275619 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 23.4991977007 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408505137762 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135799262648 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779035748372 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239258212206 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956924961519 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.2 14.1392134831 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.45 48.8420337079 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.38706741573 124% => OK
difficult_words: 189.0 100.480337079 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.