The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.
It would not be incorrect, for some spectators, that life is indeed fast-paced and it can have negative as well as positive impacts. And I mostly agree with the prompt that, this increased pace causes more problems than it solves, as reflected by the two reasons. However, I do concede that high-paced life can sometimes result in a good impact as well on our life.
Firstly, the fast-paced life can also lead us to miss out on opportunities. It wouldn't be wrong to say that rapid pace comes with the downside of opportunities being exposed for only a short while and not accessible to everyone -- not necessarily true for every case. For example, if some company has posted a job online, the one with access to the internet will be able to apply for the job, but the one without this luxury, who is living in a remote area will be missing out on this opportunity. The rapid pace of life did cost the (poor) one living in the remote location to miss out on the opportunity and this can be considered as one of the issues of the fast-paced life.
Secondly, the fast-paced life has made everyone distant from one another. Each and every individual, who has caught up in this rapid environment, has almost no time to stop and admire the surroundings, meet new people, try new adventures. For example, in today's life, people are always wired into their smartphone or laptop and not noticing what is actually going on around them. Some might argue that they can meet new people online, but do we consider that a meeting or a conversation? It wouldn't be wrong to say that living in the moment outweighs the online virtual presence. And this has caused problems of people getting more and more distant and reluctant to dive into social activities.
However, some may agree that we are becoming more efficient and it might not be incorrect to say so either. As life is getting more fast-paced, we have learned to accomplish things quickly which is further helpful in order to save time for different activities. For example, nowadays, we do have an option to order food online that saves us time to go to a restaurant, wait in line, and then further wait for the order. Instead, now we can order online and while the order is in its way, we can utilize this saved time in some other activities (maybe reading or so). And this efficiency is way more helpful and very less likely to cause any negative impacts or problems.
To conclude, It is true that rapid-paced life has some advantages outlined above but it also comes with the disadvantages as listed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | fstamim | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ead us to miss out on opportunities. It wouldnt be wrong to say that rapid pace comes w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...er that a meeting or a conversation? It wouldnt be wrong to say that living in the mome...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: IN_THE_MOMENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at the moment' (=currently)?
Suggestion: at the moment
... It wouldnt be wrong to say that living in the moment outweighs the online virtual presence. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63876651982 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58813022575 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491189427313 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0835457156 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.842105263 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8947368421 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261128628451 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088691531227 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806677972438 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160951455477 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803877239849 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.