Issue
Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Conversations about topics that may be controversial to an individual is essential in many aspects of society. Discussions allow for societies to make laws, have sounds morals, and learn. People who are set in stone about their beliefs on a certain topic may be hard to be convinced otherwise but they will benefit greatly from discussing their beliefs. Discussing their core beliefs with someone who may not agree is beneficial because both sides will benefit from being educated on the topic and they may be able to change their mind.
Discussing controversial topics may be hard without getting emotions involved, especially when someone has very strong beliefs about the topic. Although, these conversations may get heated, both sides will benefit greatly from being informed about the other sides point of view. Seeing both sides of the story may allow an individual to become more understanding and willing to consider the other side. Controversial topics also benefit society greatly. Many people develope good morals from discussing topics they disagree on. For example, a person may be so unwilling to change their mind and even consider the other side simply because they were misinformed or just did not know much about the other topic. I find this happens a lot with vaccines. Many people who are against vaccines are given incorrect information or may simply just not know the benefits outway the negatives. Many people believe vaccining their children is moraly correct because their are plenty of individuals who cannot get vaccines due to underlying illnesses and rely on the vaccinated individuals to prevent the spread of diseases.
The purpose of a discussion should not be to simply change someones mind. A discussion should allow for both sides to explain their points and allow each individual to form their own opinion. A discussion will most likely turn into an argument if their main objective is to change their mind. People will benefit from discussion their personal beliefs by seeing both sides of the stories. They may learn a point that they may not have considered before. It may not change their mind but it could make them be more considerable of the topic next time it comes up.
When discussing a topic that is extremely important, it is vital to make sure that both sides are willing to consider the opposing side to avoid an argument. Although, it may not change their mind, it may make that individual consider the opposing side when they may encounter that topic again.
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 58
- Issue Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 955, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...heir children is moraly correct because their are plenty of individuals who cannot ge...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2102.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04076738609 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5852097531 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446043165468 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6736146431 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.095238095 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311730081996 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114320049181 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732306688394 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226891993333 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05600622254 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.