Decisions taken emotionally may or may not be the right decisions but its wrong to make a claim that such decision makers are poor in taking decisions when they back up their decisions with logic.
Taking decisions based on emotion does not mean that they are devoid of logic. One may take a critical decision in an emotionally pressed situation and also have some sane reasoning for it as the same time. The two are not mutually exclusive. Take for example an unfortunate scenario where a person from a relatively poor household has suffered injuries in an accident and his only financially stable kin happens to be his sister. Now the sister of course takes an emotional decision of paying for the expenses which would save the life of her dear brother. But logic would also have it that she bears the expenses because she is the only one capable of contributing a certain sum without hurting her other interests. Its suffice to say that emotional decisions can be logically justified.
Of course there are certain scenarios where you just cannot justify decisions taken emotionally ,with logic - A person who saves most of his monthly salary to invest in a home loan to only go and spend the saved money on the latest phone because his colleague just bought one. Its a decision that is taken on emotion and easily justified by saying that his current phone has gone obsolete. But that does not make him a good decision maker rather, a poor one.
Humans tend to take decisions a lot more on emotions than on logic. But it is rather naive to think that these emotionally taken decisions cannot or do not have any logical structure supporting them. Emotional decisions have logic in them too.
- Issue Essay:-People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 58
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 32
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nnot justify decisions taken emotionally ,with logic - A person who saves most of ...
^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... because his colleague just bought one. Its a decision that is taken on emotion and...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74662162162 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4832785456 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0400190777 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41661651557 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175250832436 0.0831039109588 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114083551204 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302883959737 0.150359130593 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845020862054 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.