It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual.
There is a saying too many cooks spoils the food, which means that too many people putting all sorts of ideas in a single task usually make it worse. The idea usually innervates from a single individual, and is worked upon by a team. I totally agree with the argument that an unique idea comes from a single individual though a team work on that later on.
Supporting my argument I have very common and recent example of Steve Jobs. Apple started with an idea of designing a personal computer for all. He simply had an idea of doing something different. In a market previously dominated by giants like IBM, Apple came out of nowhere. Still today apple products are loved by people because of their unique style, they are known for their trend setting capabilities. No doubt this extraordinary success was possible because of the employees hardwork, but this company would have been nothing, if Steve does not have though distinctly.
Just by thinking of an idea is not enough, but to m work day and night to make that idea work, what successful and innovative thinkers do. Many people have never thought of traveling in a bus flying way above our head. But there was these brother Wright Brothers, who not only thought that but made their idea their passion and succeeded. In biblical times when astrologer said that sun is not revolving around but it is the other way round, they were being persecuted. Innovative approaches are never welcomed by people, it is that strong will and resistance that makes that idea believable.
In contrast, mere having an idea does not guarantee anyone success. It is the work which one do towards that dream that made it believable. We people thought that it would never have been possible to reach the moon. But irony is that we are today we are so ahead of ourselves that we are not even studying our own natural satellite, but we are building our own and sending as far as away from out solar system. This may be not even be possible if all these men just merely thought of an innovative idea.
In nut-shell we can say that innovative ideas came all in our minds but, only some selective individual believe in them make their dream come true.
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 87
- It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual. 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 49
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... I totally agree with the argument that an unique idea comes from a single individ...
^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ts like IBM, Apple came out of nowhere. Still today apple products are loved by peopl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ue style, they are known for their trend setting capabilities. No doubt this extr...
^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this brother' or 'these brethren', 'these brothers'?
Suggestion: this brother; these brethren; these brothers
...lying way above our head. But there was these brother Wright Brothers, who not only thought t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merely thought of an innovative idea. In nut-shell we can say that innovative ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, in contrast, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67268041237 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41357551 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538659793814 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1561266378 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.65 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201745193227 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636237837709 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643537021801 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109228236359 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327613192765 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.