Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
One of the fundamental pillar of well-functioning and burgeoning society is the Law. There are always a set of rules that define the very essence of a country's legal code. These rules not only help in maintaining the law and order, but also play a crucial role in serving justice without being partial to anyone in any manner. The given prompt states that laws should be more accomodative and take consideration of circumstances, times and places. In my opinion, I believe this is wrong without a shadow of doubt. There is a reason why the laws are laws, because they are firm and rigid. And I am presenting the following 2 reasons to support my take.
Firstly, we need to understand that the very meaning of law is that it is same for all. Regardless of the person, their stature, gender, financial status, social importance or influence etc. Law does not discriminate amongst people or situations. Because of this quality, every person becomes equal in the eyes of law. If the laws are structured in such a way that they considers circumstances, times, and places; this creates plathora of possibilites and lots of doors for offenders to architect a way and connive through past law and impending justice. Let's consider a hypothetical yet plausible scenario; a person robs a bank and in the process, accidently injurs the guard. Clearly, this person is punishable as robbing a bank a severe crime. But if we start to 'modify' the law by considering the circumstances, say, for instance, that the robber needed money for his sick wife. Does it makes any sense to let the person go? Does it, in any way, mitigate the seriousness of his offence? Just because there is something wrong going on in a n individual personal life, doesn't give them right or any excuse to play with the law. But if we start making laws more flexible, the system becomes a complete mayhem. Every other offender will come up with their own sob story, or will engineer an excuse pertanining to time, situation or places that will fall under the considerations or relaxations of this new 'accomodative law'.
Further, making laws flexible will create a wide range of scenario and if we go about addressing all of them, the law system will become unnecessarily intricate and lengthy. Considering a country's law system, it is already quite descriptive, detailed and covers a wide array of scenario. But if we start to make amendments with adding provisions to circumstances, times and places; it will create the law system impractical and might proveless in a pragmatic way.
Sure, some would argue that there might be cases where the severity of a person offenses is not so severe and they were indeed a victim of their circumstances, time or place. There might be some collateral damage because of which the person ended being a perpetrator. I agree with such a notion, but isn't that the whole idea and process of 'prosecution' and not the law? As I have mentioned before, law is just, without and ifs or buts. If needed be, the consideration of circumstances, times and places fall under the category of prosecution or trial, but if we start to make the laws more flexible, it will wreak havoc on the judicial system and it won't be surprising if the crime rates skyrocket yet lesser convicts are getting charged and fould guilty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 83
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty 70
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'consider'
Suggestion: consider
... are structured in such a way that they considers circumstances, times, and places; this ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: ARCHITECT_VERB[1]
Message: Architect is a noun, not a verb. Did you mean 'design' or 'devise'?
Suggestion: design; devise
...ites and lots of doors for offenders to architect a way and connive through past law and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...through past law and impending justice. Lets consider a hypothetical yet plausible s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 891, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'make'?
Suggestion: make
...needed money for his sick wife. Does it makes any sense to let the person go? Does it...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 891, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'make'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: make
...needed money for his sick wife. Does it makes any sense to let the person go? Does it...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1041, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...se there is something wrong going on in a n individual personal life, doesnt give...
^
Line 3, column 1071, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ing on in a n individual personal life, doesnt give them right or any excuse to play w...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pragmatic way" with adverb for "pragmatic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... system impractical and might proveless in a pragmatic way. Sure, some would argue that there m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...trator. I agree with such a notion, but isnt that the whole idea and process of pros...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, well, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 40.0 14.8657303371 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2735.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78984238179 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82702900922 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509632224168 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 873.9 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.119248389 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6785714286 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3928571429 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.60714285714 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224139624688 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583928771121 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543868051737 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149590337431 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437398657572 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.