The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The study of history has long been regarded edifying, as exemplified in Jane Austen’s Northanger Abbey, in which the protagonist Catherine Morland finds more intellectually sophisticated and sensible reading historical materials. Indeed, studying history proffers us human beings mirrors into past events and serves us as an avenue to avert committing the same mistakes and to reap merits from valuable lessons. A quick glance at history indeed can manifest similar repetitive patterns of humanity throughout the course. However, to asseverate that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in the past is an illusion and that studying history can help disillusion such is to outright overlook the many subtleties that have emerged throughout and enriched the progression of humanity.
Granted, one benefit of studying history is to expose some ubiquitous and universal human attributes—ranging from our desires and motives to our fears and foibles. Such human nature has remained constant over time. Julius Caesar’s desire to conquer the European territory and Adolf Hitler’s ambition to dominate the world and erase inferior races seem to denote that certain qualities of human beings do not undergo significant changes. The broadening of realm of Mongolia into Europe and the colonization of the Aztecs and Mayans by Spanish conquistadors are just among the many examples. History also instructs us that major social ills are inveterate in our root of our human civilization and that any sorts of reform and penalty have been tried with only partial success, leaving the roots of human vices intact. For instance, crime and violence have plagued the majority, if not all, of the human society. Almost all of the countries have enacted certain legislative measures to fight against crimes and social injustice, but to no avail. Additionally, history has informed us that democracy and egalitarian sovereignty would only last for so long before greed and ambition corrodes them. Take the Roman Republic. It stood for centuries as a pride of Roman citizens for being the epitome of democracy; however, the Republic began to disintegrate when the aristocrats dominating politics began to surreptitiously change the ways elections were run for their now favors. The avaricious human nature compelled these aristocrats to secure their now authority and wealth within the republic. This gradually transformed an originally inclusive and egalitarian institution that epitomizes democratic ideals into a political entity that merely benefits the very few that controlled the central power. The present-day history, therefore, is not so much different from that of the past, and the history is expected to repeat itself in the future.
Nevertheless, humans as a kind have transmogrified drastically, especially when compared with their lives of modern days to those years ago. Homo Sapiens have shifted from engaging in hunter-gathering to sedentary agricultural production, which requires the formation of villages, states, and nations. More convoluted hierarchical management systems have arisen out of the needs of controlling and stabilizing societies. Egalitarian society that dominated hunter-gathering civilizations gave way to more plutocratic society, in which the financially advantaged dominate and control the power. Besides, humans have experienced many evolutionary phases, such as Scientific Revolution, Industrial Revolution or the lunar landing in the early 20th century, in the history, during and after which more complicated and abstract ideas and notions have sprung. These ideas, if not limited to, entail the suffrage extended to women in the 20th century, the abolishment of apartheid by Nelson Mandala, the legitimation of same-sex marriage that had been previously stigmatized by United States Supreme Court. Society’s attitudes toward artistic expression, literature, scientific and intellectual inquiry, cultural mores, custom values, and ideals have been evolving and in a continual state of evolution. A heightened awareness of all the changes help us formulate informed, reflective, and enlightened values and ideals not only for ourselves but for our offspring. Our society dearly benefits as a result.
Another problem with the statement is that it clearly undervalues other equally important advantages of study history. As Winston Churchill said, “Those that failed to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Learning from history provides us an opportunity to know about the contingencies, hardships, and dilemmas that wise people faced when making their decisions. This part of learning history is critical since we can learn to be more circumspect and cautious when having to make similar decisions. Similarly, we could also learn about the courage and tenacity of history’s great leaders, explorers, pioneers, and the like. Their stories can galvanize us at the nadir of our lives. Learning history also allows us to trace to the root of social problems and issues before we attempt to resolve them.
All told, generally we can see that the study of history provides a wide array of benefits. It is true that history often repeats itself and that lives of mankind will always share some similarities. Yet, history has other lessons to offer us as well. It can help us formulate more informed values and ideals, inspire us to great achievements, point out mistakes to avert, and enlighten us on how far humanity has already progressed and evolved.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
2023-10-17 | raghavchauhan619 | 54 | view |
2023-10-07 | AmieeZhao | 58 | view |
2023-08-25 | maryle | 83 | view |
2023-08-23 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
- "Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just complet 66
- Agree or Disagree:The most important ways to improve the people’s health is to clean the environment. 90
- "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies 55
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at s 73
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals. "In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bac 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 929, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...f not all, of the human society. Almost all of the countries have enacted certain legislat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 44.0 14.8657303371 296% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 28.0 11.3162921348 247% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 112.0 58.6224719101 191% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4712.0 2235.4752809 211% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 847.0 442.535393258 191% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56316410862 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.39474414794 4.55969084622 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0365910422 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 464.0 215.323595506 215% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547815820543 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 1514.7 704.065955056 215% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.474475055 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.888888889 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5277777778 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159775366663 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365631435928 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512309167216 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990197813108 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640215231903 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.38706741573 124% => OK
difficult_words: 300.0 100.480337079 299% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.