Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another

Discoveries and creations are purposely made when seeking to answer a question. The prompt urges that discoveries or creations are normally found on accident while seeking the answer to one question and we come across the answer to another. I mostly disagree with this claim and will elaborate on the necessary points to defend my position.

To begin with, most discoveries are made when scientists explore for them based on data that suggest where something may be. For example, when in search for fuel sources such as gasoline, scientists use technology to reveal where the search should take place. A study from Yale University revealed that the technology used today can search up to 10,000 feet underneath the Earth's surface. This is imperative because fracking is a technique that should be used sparingly and is not something that should be done randomly without certainty about the whereabouts are for what they're looking for.

In addition, aside from discoveries that are made based purposefully, creations are also made with intention. The invention of the electric car was not made on accident. Nicholas Tesla invented the alternative fuel sourced vehicle in order to improve the sustainability of the gasoline powered vehicles we are accustomed to using. A study from Princeton University showed that the efficiency of electric vehicles has improved tremendously over the past decade and will soon become affordable to the general population. This is paramount to the longevity of our planet and further proves the notion that these creations are not something that is randomly stumbled upon on accident.

On the other hand, in contrast to my stance on the topic, one could argue that some of the most important discoveries in uncovering dinosaur fossils have been made while in search for other things such as types of rocks. A study from Stanford in 2019 revealed that the largest dinosaur fossil was discovered while in search for sapphire. However, these accidental findings don't occur nearly as often as the findings that occur when intentionally looking for the material. Thus, since majority of the findings take place when people intentionally search for them, we can be sure that most of the important findings are not accidental.

Nevertheless, there are no easy answers to this question because this issue is very complex. Although it is true that some discoveries and creations have been found on accident in the past, most of the answers to questions that we seek out are found purposefully for the reasons that I have described above.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...inty about the whereabouts are for what theyre looking for. In addition, aside from...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ire. However, these accidental findings dont occur nearly as often as the findings t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...f the answers to questions that we seek out are found purposefully for the reasons ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15550239234 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74047108585 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7244305873 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.722222222 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.21951772744 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259882106893 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918369428761 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137959490255 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176140629369 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162016521873 0.0667264976115 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.