" Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. "
The society has different stereotype roles for men and women. Even today in most countries women are not afforded an equal status, and in some countries women are not allowed to work. Tracing this back to the beginning of times, an often raised question is why did men act as hunters and women stay back as care-givers? One of the reasons often believed is because women and men are physically different, and are not equally suited for many tasks. men were believed to be more suited to hunting than women, it was believed. And another school of thoughts believe that though they have inherent physical differences, the reasons women didnt go for hunting was because they were deemed to be an asset to the society in terms of reproductive capacity, not because of ill suitedness for the task.
While it is true that men and women have inherent physical differences, this does not necessarily mean that they are not equally suited for many tasks. Over the years as the societies shackles for women have been breaking women are often entering to tasks that were previously thought to be well suited for men. With advent of time their has been an increase in instances of stay of home dads, with women acting as providers of the household. Increasing women are being appointed as CEOs, Managers, Scientists,etc. and are known to perform at par with men and helping in some way to dispel the myth of unequal efficiences.
While above examples show that for tasks that are not physical in nature, the physical difference does not matter, it is interesting to explore the potential ramifications of different physical attributes on physical tasks. Not all men are equal and not all women are equal. It is interesting to note that some women perform better than some men even on physical tasks, and vice versa for men. So such blanket statement attributing unequal suitedness to even physical tasks seem faulty.
An example to further illustrate this is that women athletes are fitter than average non-athlete men and could in many caasesplay these sport at par from the average guys, the reason this phenomenon is ignored is that women owing to their stereotypes are restricted to a particular lifestyle which could restrict their suitedness to certin task. However if such past factors could be addresed women could perform at par with men in most if not all tasks.
it should be noted that women and men are not equally suited to all tasks, but care should be taken in attributing them to just physical differences. And also some particular jobs requiring a lot of sustained physicl strain may not be suited for women and some tasks may not be appropriate for men, such blanket statements have in the past led to stereo-types in gender roles further sthrengthening the bias. After appropriate training and opportunities such non suitedness accounting on physical diffrences could be corrected for many tasks if not all.
- Three years ago when we surveyed our subscribers they complained about the quality of the reporting and writing in the paper Since that time we have made a concerted effort to hire older more experienced journalists According to our most recent survey the 70
- There has been a rise in the support for uniform national curriculum over the past years. While it is true that, the current system of different curriculum provides more flexiibility to the parents, to choose the curriculum in accordance with the needs 69
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen 52
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sendin 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Men
... are not equally suited for many tasks. men were believed to be more suited to hunt...
^^^
Line 1, column 635, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...physical differences, the reasons women didnt go for hunting was because they were de...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , etc
... appointed as CEOs, Managers, Scientists,etc. and are known to perform at par with ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tc. and are known to perform at par with men and helping in some way to dispel th...
^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...strict their suitedness to certin task. However if such past factors could be addresed ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ar with men in most if not all tasks. it should be noted that women and men are ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.6327345309 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 16.3942115768 18% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2429.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 495.0 441.139720559 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90707070707 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66788004228 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 204.123752495 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434343434343 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 763.2 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.67365269461 418% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5481304997 57.8364921388 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.45 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 23.324526521 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.70786347227 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412597277581 0.218282227539 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154338715886 0.0743258471296 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107875419135 0.0701772020484 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25673435396 0.128457276422 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747390818241 0.0628817314937 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.3799401198 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.