Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address

Essay topics:

Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

We live in a world all humans are given equal fundamental rights sans one's sex, caste, color etc. However, that being said, there is an inherent recalcitrence to treat men and women equally. This prompt recommends that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks due to their physical differences. In my opinion, I agree with the recommendation and argue that there is slight preference when its comes down where one is competent enough for a particular job. Altough, I have certain reservations, I would corroborate with the thought for these reasons.

To begin with, we cannot deny that both men and women are distinctly different from one another. Both the sexes have certain features pertainting to the corresponding sex like the physical growth. For instance, men are generally more physically strong due to their broad shoulders and body structures. Perhaps it is the reason why men are preferred for arduous tasks such as serving in army on border. However, we cannot deny that women too play a major role in these services but men are more prominent. This example illustrates how generally men are more suited for ardent tasks.

Secondly, alongside differences in physical attributes, the human nature have predefined certain tasks to specific creatures. It is just the natural incination of that living organism to do their job. This is equally aplicable to humans. For instance, only women are blessed with the ability to bring new life in existence(offspring) . They provide the germane process to carry the human race forward. Likewise, women are generally more caring and generous in nature. We can consider our mother who cares for the whole family. This just shows how women are suited for tasks where generosity is required. Research has consistentely demonstarted that women are more 'giving' compared to thier counterparts in marriage. This example further enhances the argument for the prompt.

Ofcourse, some might argue that both men and women are equally suited for many tasks and recent achievements in the varied fields haven proven the same. However, this might be the case in few instances such as sports or politics, but looking at it holistically, we can understand the proclivity towards the recommendation that men and women are not equally euiped for many tasks. If the author is abled to provide examples to challange this position, it would be more viable for us to evaluate the argument completely.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'human'?
Suggestion: human
We live in a world all humans are given equal fundamental rights sans...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...are given equal fundamental rights sans ones sex, caste, color etc. However, that be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to play'?
Suggestion: to play
...der. However, we cannot deny that women too play a major role in these services but men ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... to bring new life in existenceoffspring . They provide the germane process to car...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, look, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 400.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1275 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79830946819 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 204.123752495 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5475 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 705.55239521 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 4.96107784431 363% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0660942791 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4583333333 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 23.324526521 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45833333333 5.70786347227 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.20758483034 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248086797606 0.218282227539 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741272917043 0.0743258471296 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560426277235 0.0701772020484 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169571168707 0.128457276422 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275762053324 0.0628817314937 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.3799401198 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 98.500998004 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.