Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address

Essay topics:

Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.”

History shows that men and women are never treated equally. For long time, the make and shape of people decided the way society treated them. From "Right to Work" to "Right to Vote", all of them came with immense struggle to one gender i.e. female. One major reason was that the male chauvinist society believed for long time that women were not equally suited in many arduous jobs. They considered that their fragile and tender body, and biological life pattern makes them unfit for many tasks which men can certainly do.

Here, the author presents the same inflammatory issue. By claiming that men and women are not equally suited for "many" tasks because of their inherent physical differences. I strongly, disagree with author's claim because of three reasons.

Firstly, once given a chance women have proved that no inherent physical differences can stop them from performing equal at times or even better with respect to the men. If Neil Armstrong reached moon, so did Kalpana Chawala! If A.P.J. Abdul Kalam became president of India then so did Mrs. Pratibha Patel. These days, every channel and page of news are filled with success stories of visionary women leaders and sportswomen like Sania Mirza. Hence, be it physically demanding sports like badminton or leading a country- women have made their places irrespective of long lasting perceived physical differences and discrimination. Hence, author's claim is unacceptable atleast after listening to above success stories of women in several diverse tasks.

Secondly, men whom for long time society were considered unsuitable for household work and taking care of their children have recently excelled in doing household work together with taking care of their children. This change became possible only because aware men bolster the fact that women are not more suitable for household work and appreciated equality even above the perceived physical differences. The word like 'Motherhood' got replaced with 'Parenthood'. All this reveals that there are tasks which for long time were perceived to be more suited for women are equally suitable to men. All they need is an initiative to try them. All it need is an understanding of equality. Hence, even in such examples authors claim is unacceptable.

Lastly, one may argue that biologically there are many tasks that men and women are not equally suited. Like although men support child birth, their body is not suited for child birth and care. Only women's body have enough resources and glands to give birth. Admittedly, such arguments do challenge my position. However, one needs to understand that these are not 'many' but a 'few' places where men and women are not equally suited. Further, these are not tasks but propagation of generation. Tasks are those which can impact an individual growth and affect society. Also with development in science, the day is not far when even these differences will be diminished.

Hence, in conclusion, men and women have different shape and make. But they are equally suited for many tasks. There are situation in past when people second question this but they were eventually proved wrong by the hard work of several women -who outperformed men and the understanding of several men - who supported and gave equal respect to their partners and women in society. Hence, author's claim is strongly unacceptable.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-11 Anish Sapkota 50 view
2023-08-10 Anish Sapkota 66 view
2023-08-04 DCAD123 50 view
2023-01-23 Pranav Lohote 66 view
2022-10-02 motherastronaut12 58 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...easons. Firstly, once given a chance women have proved that no inherent physical d...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 635, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...they need is an initiative to try them. All it need is an understanding of equality...
^^^
Line 9, column 565, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...n individual growth and affect society. Also with development in science, the day is...
^^^^
Line 11, column 122, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'situations'?
Suggestion: situations
...qually suited for many tasks. There are situation in past when people second question thi...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2848.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19708029197 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62204877223 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492700729927 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 897.3 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.4879534847 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335304494305 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847941109758 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752296300508 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198325040787 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500211095349 0.0667264976115 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.