Music talents are recognized only after they are dead.
Do we care about musician only after they are dead only? Their real talent is only assessed after they are dead, this is what the speaker claims. Although speaker's claim seems tempting to agree as we have seen many artists not being appreciated when they are alive, but the speaker seems a bit extreme in saying that. Thus, I only conditionally agree with the speaker's assertion.
To begin with, let us take the example of music paragon, Beethoven. He brought remarkable changes in the field of music. He established new trend. However he was never appreciated when he was alive. His actual talent was only evaluated many years after he was dead. After so many years, now he is considered the god of music. Similar was the case of Mozart. Mozart, a musical prodigy, never got the praise which he deserved and only the generation after him came to value his talent.However, the same case is not always. There are a lot of musician who are appreciated when they are still alive. As an example we can see Michael Jackson. His different style of music was recognized and he got fame and praise when he was still alive.
The case of music is evolutionary. At one generation some kind of music is liked and at one generation another is liked. At 1980s America, hip-hop music became popular and that time gave rise to many musician who were likely to sing hip-hop songs. Some time back rock music was popular. Time changes and taste of music too and thus the musician also fade away as their talent is not popular among people. Having said so, we cannot discard the fact that many musicians are lauded, apperetiated and their honest assessment is also done when they are still alive.
Additionally, we can cite many other present time singer. Bipul Chhetri, a prominent singer at our country, is famous for his different singing style. He sings on his own only aiding the music with guitar not any other musical instruments. This brought new trend in our country and many other singers also started singing in his style. He was even provided award for giving rise to new path in the music sector of our country. Of course, more than at presented he will be lauded at future, as we do such with our past singers, this doesnot mean that real talent cannot be assessed until they are dead and thus their fame doesnot interfere with their talent.
To sum up, athough their are many instances in which the actuale talent of musician being assessed only after their demise, we can several examples where such talents are recognized when they are alive too. They can be appretiated even more in the future, their creativity, imagination may be found anachronistic and thus be apperetiated forthermore, we cannot depict this as none of them being apperetiated when they are alive and their fame not being equivalent to their talent.
- Some people feel that high school students should be required to do volunteer work in their free time Others think that they should spend their free time studying and preparing for classes Which do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to 78
- In your opinion, which of the following strategies is the best way for a student to prepare for a successful career?Studying specific academic subjectsTaking a part-time jobGetting to know other studentsUse specific reasons and examples to support your an 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should be required to follow strict rules set by their parents Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 58
- “Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of allowing television advertising to be directed toward young children (aged two to five). Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.” 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...us, I only conditionally agree with the speakers assertion. To begin with, let us take ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eld of music. He established new trend. However he was never appreciated when he was al...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 483, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...tion after him came to value his talent.However, the same case is not always. There are...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 513, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...is talent.However, the same case is not always. There are a lot of musician who are ap...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 531, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun musician seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of musicians'.
Suggestion: a lot of musicians
... the same case is not always. There are a lot of musician who are appreciated when they are still...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... appreciated when they are still alive. As an example we can see Michael Jackson. ...
^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun musician seems to be countable; consider using: 'many musicians'.
Suggestion: many musicians
...came popular and that time gave rise to many musician who were likely to sing hip-hop songs. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... with their talent. To sum up, athough their are many instances in which the actuale...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, kind of, of course, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 42.0 19.5258426966 215% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72819472617 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43950712779 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468559837728 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.9949024205 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3793103448 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10344827586 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357924409893 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10258568342 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106156642781 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210051694647 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731010932767 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.