A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The speaker claims that a country should make rules such that all the students read same curriculum until they are in high school. The speaker assumes that uniformity will make the evaluation process easier and ultimately support the nation however he fails to evaluate the disadvantages of national curriculum and thus I disagree with the speaker’s assertion.
To begin with, a nation is never homogeneous. A variety of ethnic group live there, the geography of various place is different; the climate too. In such situation applying same curriculum in all places is not beneficial. How can a national curriculum address the problem of Chennai, which is warmer and inhabited by majority of Muslims? It instead fails to address the problem of both the places and the education has ultimately no benefit in solving the problems there.
Additionally, in a nation there live people of heterogeneous interests and capacity. Not all have same likeness, same aspiration and hopes from life. Moreover not all can solve the same difficulty of maths problems. Having same national curriculum means the difficulty of curriculum to be average which may not be accessible by the student who is poorer than average. In such case he will consider himself as useless fellow not capable of doing anything. Also all student may not like to work on same field. Can we imagine Einstein reading literature and bringing great revolution on that sector? Also we can never imagine Lionel Messi doing some physics calculation and challenging Stephan Hawking. They are capable in their own field and would not have been this successful had they been forced to aspire anything other than their interest.
In contrast, the national curriculum serves the nation to evaluate the students without bias as all the students will be judged under same curriculum. Also this will help in teaching the students about the subject of national interest like democracy; foreign policy; national security. However in all this too we cannot be sure if the curriculum maker will not be bias while designing the course. National curriculum may even have negative impact as a country may instead motivate not for their improvement but for the nation’s purpose. For example a government can provide misleading information about another country and urge the students to act against the country.
To sum up; though having national curriculum may serve well the country in teaching the established norms and values, its disadvantages outweighs the benefits. Heterogeneity among people makes applying the national curriculum useless and hence a country shouldn’t strive for national curriculum.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 66
- People’s attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surrounding than by society as a whole. 50
- Some people feel that high school students should be required to do volunteer work in their free time Others think that they should spend their free time studying and preparing for classes Which do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to 78
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...s, same aspiration and hopes from life. Moreover not all can solve the same difficulty o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s fellow not capable of doing anything. Also all student may not like to work on sam...
^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...inging great revolution on that sector? Also we can never imagine Lionel Messi doing...
^^^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s will be judged under same curriculum. Also this will help in teaching the students...
^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...acy; foreign policy; national security. However in all this too we cannot be sure if th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30260047281 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82804376595 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517730496454 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.975012821 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5217391304 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3913043478 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397993816229 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117210700433 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09189457208 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230164863431 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052403044143 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.