Education is one of the most important knowledge required in this rugged, competitive world. There isn't any doubt that a literate would most plausibly get a better-paid job than an illiterate since a literate would face far fewer obstacles while trying to achieve zenith in life. Eventually, a question arises on whether a centralised or omnipresent curriculum should be followed in the whole nation until they enter college? The answer to this question is quandary and we need to consider a number of examples. Although unifying the education curriculum has numerous pros there are a few cases which won't hold good and the board needs to address these shortcomings as well.
Firstly, unifying would make judging students select them for a college would be way easier. Consider two schools, namely, A and B. Let A have a curriculum which is way easier than B. It is highly plausible that a talented kid studying in School B will have a lower GPA than a moderate kid studying in School A and thus giving a greater advantage for the moderate kid than the talented kid. We could eliminate this problem completely by adopting a national curriculum.
Moreover, It would be easier to hire teachers, unify textbooks and guides. If a teacher is changing jobs then it is simpler for both the teacher and the school as the curriculum is same and the teacher need not learn additional resources in order to match the standards of a new school. Textbooks can also be suggested for a particular subject which would make the books available at a cheaper rate due to mass production and kids need not go buy books of expensive authors. Another advantage of unifying the curriculum would be that it would be lighter on the parents' pockets. Schools who charge atrociously huge sums and provide way too many courses can be eliminated and can implement a general fee structure for the courses.
Additionally, there are a number of challenges which the unifying board needs to address in order to implement this. A person who loves singing would not want to sit in a quantum physics class. The board needs to offer various choices in order to give every student their passionate subject and also not compromise on the syllabus of each course. Another challenge would be to make the syllabus not too hard nor too easy, the syllabus needs to be designed in such a way that an average student can easily clear the subject but needs to work diligently in order to ace the subject. Overall, with addressing the challenges mentioned and implementing a national curriculum would be advantageous, nonetheless, it would throw a lot of obstacles as well. overcoming all these would provide a solid solution to way too many problems and would lucidly have a positive impact on the hoi-polloi.
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum quot Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our s 65
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and 60
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 75
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 75
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...n this rugged, competitive world. There isnt any doubt that a literate would most pl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 750, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overcoming
...would throw a lot of obstacles as well. overcoming all these would provide a solid solutio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87076271186 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75393006761 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514830508475 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4780219472 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4761904762 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151722553643 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502629142028 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511014843095 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098073334901 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201954172891 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.