A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
I don't completely agree with the recommendation. I think although that most of the students should take the same curriculum, there are some talented students that need special courses to help them develop their extraordinary skills.
First, there is some basic knowledge that every student should acquire no matter where they are from. By provideing a national curriculum, we can make sure that every student in the nation have the ability to deal with some basic problems that they might face in their lives. For example, everyone should know how to do some basic calculations. Otherwise, they can't even know how much money they should pay for products they purchased. For another example, they should also have the ability to read and write with the major language of the nation. If they fail to do so, they can't even communicate with others and express their feelings and thoughts. Also, the same curriculum can provide a same starting point for all students, ensuring the equality across different areas of the nation.
Second, for any policies, cost is an important factor to be considered. By regulating every school to provide the same curriculum, the government can reduce the spending on education. If every school in the nation has its own curriculum, it needs to find the suitable teacher for every subject it wants to provide. For example, schools in the rural area would also need to hire teachers for every specific domain, which could be a burden for the government in the countryside. However, if all schools use the same national curriculum, we might be able to reduce the cost. For example, we can use remote education with the help of techonology. Therefore, we only need to hire a few teachers but they can teach the same subjects to students in many different regions at the same time.
Yet, not every student is suitable for the same curriculum. There are some talented students that need the government to provide special courses in order to develop their skills. For example, some students perform much better in math than the others. These students should not be treated as the normal kids. Instead, they should be able to take the advanced courses such as linear algebra or calculus for the sake of developing the experts of the next generation. For another example, a small portion of kids are talented in drawing. The government should have a special school of arts that teach them how to improve their skills. By doing so, the nation could have more specialists consistently.
To conclude, althogh I think that a national curriculum could benefit the nation, I don't completely agree with the recommendation that the same curriculum should be applied to all students. Instead, I think that there are some talented students that need to take some professional courses to improve their skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
I dont completely agree with the recommendatio...
^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ome basic calculations. Otherwise, they cant even know how much money they should pa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the nation. If they fail to do so, they cant even communicate with others and expres...
^^^^
Line 5, column 743, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... teach the same subjects to students in many different regions at the same time. Yet, not e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... curriculum could benefit the nation, I dont completely agree with the recommendatio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2359.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98731501057 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62971181637 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429175475687 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5023923612 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7307692308 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1923076923 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19230769231 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30758071267 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988991192014 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080920301298 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202186155454 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605214337649 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.