A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
Recent discussion on the need for students in elementary and high schools to have a uniform curriculum has somewhat gained traction. The acceptance is in part to certain people's belief that a unified system at those levels provides far more benefits. However, I mostly disagree with this perspective for two reasons that I will discuss in the writeup. Nevertheless, I do concede that there are exceptions, and situations where such curriculum is favorable.
To begin, education curriculum is beneficial when need-based, i.e., structured to cater for the demography. Over-generalization of concepts without paying particular attention to the peculiarities of different localities will pose more harm than good. For example, the academic courses in an industrialized region being the same with that of a rustic environment does not portend benefits for students in deciding what comes next after, say, high school. A pastoral area may favor agrarian inclination. while a metropolitan region will be best served with technological leanings.
In addition, acquiring knowledge with the needs of the locale in mind will help in proffering solutions to endemic problems.
Moreover, a curriculum that is not generalized provides an avenue for eclectic erudition. By differing the interest of the students from an early stage, they will grow to specialize in various fields, thereby creating diversity in knowledge. For instance, learning science and technology from high school will be a springboard for students inclined to those areas of knowledge and integrating or compounding such in a higher learning institution will become easier.
On the other hand, a standardized system presents a good argument to a degree. Given that a nation may have general needs and outlook at the federal level, every student having a similar educational foundation seems valid in such sense.
In conclusion, a curriculum, while majorly tailored to the locale of the students should also contain certain generalized or common knowledge to a reasonable extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-24 | rookobay | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | LAGADAPATI VINAY | 33 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | zanzendegi | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | poiuy23567 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | Eeshan | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...al area may favor agrarian inclination. while a metropolitan region will be best serv...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al area may favor agrarian inclination. while a metropolitan region will be best serv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53184713376 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15127187378 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617834394904 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.16424021 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5625 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13111212049 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370238786993 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323965721735 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605122521463 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279308482019 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.