Fixing the national curriculum for students is not a trivial one. The prompt recommends that a nation should maintain a constant curriculum for all students before they enter into college. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the suggestion and argue that national curriculum should remain same, before entering college, for two reasons.
To begin, a student needs a certain level of maturity to make a decision whether he/she would study science, arts, commerce or something else. A student at the age of five, ten, fifteen, surely don’t have the knowledge about how a field impacts one’s life in this changing world. So, after gaining certain maturity a student should decide his goal, career etc. if we split the curriculum, a student may admit into science program at the age of five or ten, decision making by his family, and later he may realize that he don’t love to study science. His passion is on arts. So, by changing decision, now, it will be a quandary situation for him as he already invested his time to study science. And if he continues against his passion, he won’t be able to give his full dedication to it. Thus, maintaining same curriculum, before getting into college, is a paramount importance for setting a student’s future goal perfectly.
Further, even if we want to study science and build our carrier in the growing field of science, we need a basic knowledge of arts, commerce, sports, politics etc. so we need a platform to know this kind of knowledges. An engineering university, certainly, never teach someone about politics. In my opinion, before getting into college, a student should learn this basic thing via common national curriculum.
To wrap up, considering different viewpoints and aiming for practical solutions is key when dealing with complex issues. Of course, some may argue that if I want to be an engineer, there is no need to study subject like biology, which may include in common curriculum, because of same curriculum. I would say, how do I know at the age of five or ten that I want to be an engineer? So, maintaining same curriculum is not necessary before getting into college, it is mandatory for a nation.
- Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two different regions The buildings were erected by two different 47
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 50
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o 60
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health related products Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in ar 55
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, thus, kind of, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88918918919 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69860364834 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537837837838 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1436666969 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2105263158 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73684210526 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196058616937 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685103833606 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696134362765 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14078166218 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893673080413 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, thus, kind of, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88918918919 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69860364834 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537837837838 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1436666969 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2105263158 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73684210526 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196058616937 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685103833606 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696134362765 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14078166218 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893673080413 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.