A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

The author's claim that a nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college is, I believe is a compelling argument. This however, does not mean that the students should be forced to study something that does not aid in them achieving their dreams. In making the curriculum uniform, the nation must provide the students with options to choose among subjects that they are interested in pursuing.

Firstly, there are extensive procedures that colleges must follow when keeping in mind the admission process. They monitor various aspects of the students' efficiency. By making the curriculum uniform throughout the nation, the colleges can judge the students equally and not make unfair exceptions for students coming from either a tough background or a comparatively easier one.

Secondly, it makes comparison between any two potential candidates easier because they have been educated in an equal capacity. Take for example, the case in India wherein the IITJEE is one of the toughest exams to clear to get admission into the premier Indian Institute of Technology. A common problem that the country faces is that the students who are taught under a specific type of curriculum such as CBSE outperform those that enroll themselves in stateboard curriculums. As a result, a huge percentage of the candidates vying for a seat in the IIT's lose out on their chances. It deprives them of getting high quality education in a premier institute.

Thirdly, by following a national curriculum from the first grade, we can ensure that the students are almost equal in a mental capacity. An issue that the nation should try to solve when adopting such a drastic change, is that they must not compromise on the difficulty level of the curriculum. It is inevitable that students come from different backgrounds and are to an extent incapable of surviving in a competitive environment. To accomodate this, the nation should take steps to make sure that these students do not drop out of schools. Free compensations or tuitions must be organized by the school members to let these students catch up.

Unless the nation follows through with efficient measures to make sure that people from rural areas do not drop out of schools stating a hard curriculum as a reason, this approach will fail. Countries like China and Japan follow a uniform curriculum and have observed major strides in the education field. It allows for a normalized approach to college admission. Keeping in mind the various fields that students are allowed to choose, the government should come up with a mulitude of options that the students can choose from in high schol. A student aiming to become a doctor must choose the curriculum aiding him/her in suceeding in the medical field. The same must apply for say, a student aiming to pursue law, engineering etc.

In conclusion, though I strongly believe that a uniform curriculum will help promote high quality education by equalizing the intake of information and the level of problem solving seen in students, the nation is also responsible in ensuring that the students from rural or poor backgrounds do not back out of getting education because of not being able to cope up with other bright students.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ss. They monitor various aspects of the students efficiency. By making the curriculum un...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2738.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 540.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07037037037 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70990157192 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6145251226 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.043478261 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4782608696 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360234147778 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102050587163 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136540704588 0.0758088955206 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201538513365 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164865591067 0.0667264976115 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.