Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be

Human history has come across many scandals in various fields such as scandals by powerful politicians or very famous personalities in sports or in the entertainment industry. The claim that scandals are useful in focussing our attention on problems is very true.

Firstly, we live in a society that is hugely crowded with people of various intentions, characteristics and ideals. Many people believe that they live in an ideal world where everything is perfect. This is hardly the case in today's world. Although we have speakers, reformers and people in high positions warning the general population about the dangers in the world, it is hard for us to believe that out world in general is not perfect unless we experience it. Scandals in a way expose this truth by giving them a living example of the cruelty in the world.

Secondly, talking about the problems can in no way make a common man understand the severity of it actually becoming true. Neither does it reach a large section of the population. By exposing scandals people are brought face-to-face with the problems and are forced to face it. They are pushed into the harsh reality of what our world has become and the type of people co-existing with them. They are now made to question each and every motive and thus know the problems that they might have to face. This allows them to be ready to face any problem thrown at them by this society.

It is true that exposing people to these harsh problems can make them not trusting and cynical in general. It makes them aware of the ugly side of this world and this can make people be cruel. But this alternative is far better than people not learning about the dangers only to be made to come in contact with them in the future and not expect such a turn of events. Our society is not perfect and it is high time we learn to cope with it.
A perfect example of a scandal that recently took place is women coming forward to support one another in the #metoo campaign. It is a known fact that almost every woman in this huge society has experienced gender discrimination or sexual harrasment at one point in their lives. But unless a few brave women come forward recounting some of their actual experiences and henceforth exposing the men accountable, it becomes hard for the people around the world to actually understand the extent of this horrible reality. Now people are made to face this harsh truth and actually see living, breathing victims of this problem. This understanding could have not been brought to the fore by speakers and gender activists campaigning about it.

Scandals can expose the ugly side of the world but it also allows people to adapt to this society in a way that would not have happened by mere talk. This allows people to acknowledge the not so perfect world they live in and be successful because they now know the dangers that they will face in each step of their life.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in general, such as, talking about, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 28.8173652695 219% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 55.5748502994 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2408.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 516.0 441.139720559 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.12650576532 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4817312192 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445736434109 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 705.55239521 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8608370406 57.8364921388 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.70786347227 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 6.88822355289 232% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131519389672 0.218282227539 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465134091228 0.0743258471296 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043264130942 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822795506763 0.128457276422 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360073898614 0.0628817314937 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.