We all know that every individual has different dreams, different attitude, and different inherent capacity. If we allow them to do the same task, do you think that all portray the same consequences? The answer is obvious, "No". So, I strongly disagree with the salutatory statement given above.
The first reason for my belief is that every humankind is free to choose whatever they like to be without harming others. If a nation kills the dream of any individuals by allowing them to study the same curriculum, it is against humanity. Not only this, if we force them to study the same curriculum against there will, they cannot get success in their future endeavor. For example, if a recent erudite scientist were forced by meantime ruler to study history, what happened to their recent reputation? This example clearly depicts that all student should have the right of selecting curriculum best fitted for them.
The second reason for my belief is that a lively nation requires a different kind of manpower. The similar curriculum cannot engender a different kind of manpower. For instance, one cannot be an engineer and another cannot be a doctor by the same curriculum. So, If a country wants to go a long journey of development with self-sufficiency, varieties of the curriculum should be allowed to the student according to their wishes and the national requirement.
Moreover, there is also some fact beneath the statement that some basic curriculum should require all student before entering college. For example, basic knowledge of mathematics, science and the fluency in written and study the specific language. However, nowadays, the stream of different discipline is already demarketed from the beginning of the middle school. So, the curriculum should be made specific before entering college.
By making a long story short, the same curriculum for every student below the college couldn't develop a specific capacity to pursue the degree of their choice in college education. However, the basic knowledge of math, science, history and specific language is needed to maintain in a curriculum for all.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
- In any given field, the leading voices come from people who are motivated not by conviction but by the desire to present opinions and ideas that differ from those held by the majority. 50
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 63
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 75
- It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developin 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...lum for every student below the college couldnt develop a specific capacity to pursue t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2332361516 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81540586996 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521865889213 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0878271837 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4736842105 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271078132287 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796643614724 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475912081195 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140675098088 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335401625842 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.