Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Today society, is dealing with the constant debate of what to do with wilderness areas. Due to global climate change, enviromentals suggest that the wilderness should proteced. However, however and overpopulated nation, might need to reevaluate the needs of their state, wether they need the space, or innovate their usage in a way where they can protect their wildnerness and acccommodate their basic need for living space. Global Climate Change is an urgent matter, each nation should consider their geographical space, and apply such laws to accommodate the basic needs of their nation.
In the early 1900’s American were exploring the West and in doing this, they required a lot of essential needs like wood from trees to build their homes. This was before the National Parks Act existed, the Red Wood Trees were being cut down imperatively. At the time, this was a need, and if National Parks Act was in place, people would have not been able to make a living, neverthless a home. Even though these were Redwood tress, people needed to build, homes and communities, not perserve nature.
John Muir famously wrote in his journals about the great Sequoia Trees, much so that it caught President Roosevelt’s attention, he himself came to California to witness this grand beauty of the parks. It impacted him much so that he estblished the National Park Act, which are the laws the still protect our National Parks today. Geograpbhical space was an abundance, and saving these forest was feasable. Now, that people were settled, and had communities, growing. It was a need to protect these parks for being destroyed.
Nowadays, the human population is growing rapidly, much so that more geographical space is needed, and global climate change is changing our weather drastically. Within the United States, this is always a question of debate. Now it seems the space is needed, but it can be to a certain extent. Not all, nations need to laws to enforce, this, but there can be some suggested modifications. Instead, of removing laws like the National Parks Act, maybe there can be a way where it can be modified to today’s living needs and wants.
Most of the time Wilderness is destroyed of economical gain, depending on the country and it’s needs. However, nations need to evaluate their laws to stay current with the living standards of today. If the country is in critical need of economic gain, then that is what the coutry needs, but not all should be held up to the same law. In order to establish these laws, nations need to consider the economic need, population, wilderness, geographical space, and possibly climate change. Nations should pass laws to perserve their remaining wilderness, based on their current needs.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 wenki31 58 view
2019-12-29 Sumaiya Mila 50 view
2019-12-04 Md. Kawsar Ahmed 50 view
2019-11-14 chapagain08 50 view
2019-11-06 KarinaShine 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user smarty101 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03719912473 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67248112007 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514223194748 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0917135981 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.086956522 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8695652174 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.65217391304 5.21951772744 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173008290108 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583345524358 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473079772364 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103773476345 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498594280042 0.0667264976115 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.