No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.
I agree with the author statement because no field will be advanced if different knowledge and experience do not bring out
from the various field. Today's world has no knowledge of confined within a boundary. The more the experience or knowledge shared the more it increases.
Firstly, let's talk about science which explores the knowledge from milky way to the very deep inside in the earth. Science explores many mysterious objects that people did not know about 100 years ago and it was possible for the reconciling of the various field. For instances, we all know about the periodic table which is significant for the chemist. The development of the periodic table was not only done by the chemist. It also more advances by other fields like a mathematician who calculated the atomic mass, electron number etc. Moreover, Astronauts also use the field of physics for calculating the length from earth to unknown particle or planet etc. So, for the advancement of any field needs other fields for the knowledge and experience.
Secondly, another important sector is doctor which is assumed as the most divine field. But, if the technology is not advance or the field is confined in a boundary then this sector will be deteriorated. The use of the different instrument in this sector is advanced by the engineers and the researchers. From normal oxygen pumping to the ECG machine, the x-ray machine is the development of the science.
However, some pioneers in the world who did not care about others, they did not expect any corroboration or support from others. They work hard and explore new idea and knowledge. The scientist Newton who works almost every field like mathemathics, antronomy, physis etc. He develops many ideas without understanding other fields of study. Moreover, Albert Einstein knows for relativity theory who discover it with his own knowledge and by the power of imagination. Thought imagination system he set up the experiment and become the world's great scientist.
To conclude, for development and advancement knowledge is essential from the other fields and when a various field is reconciled the advancement will have been amazing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-26 | Shadoone | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | mina680 | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Seema Modak | 58 | view |
| 2019-04-19 | cr.sumiran | 66 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | atiras | 70 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to jobs that are very different from their parents' job. Use specific reasons and examples to support you 71
- tpo 18In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Exp 78
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far 63
- Keating launched a widely viewed series of television advertisements that focused on preservingthe natural environment of Town T, a topic neglected by candidate Miller. Subsequently, candidateKeating won the election by a narrow margin.This year, if candi 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12676056338 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78170404703 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.265342055 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303820544207 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899110432406 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855988038198 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187552734791 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644341117156 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.