In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author of the issue highlights that students should be needed to take imaginative courses related to literature in order to be skilled and experienced people in the different field. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general agreement on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that students should be required to take courses based on their interest and desire I order to be well-rounded in a specific field. In the following paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, students are the pillars of every given society, which play an important role all around the globe. For this reason, patronize and support them is of utmost critical importance issue especially for educators. Broadly speaking, it is incumbent upon educators to galvanize students to continue their education and reach a higher level but they should take individuals' interest into consideration. Although literature and imaginative courses like poem, myth and so forth, strengthen their brain's imagination, without interest it is far-reaching to achieve success and progress in every field of study. Delve further into the issue, if students are required to take imaginative courses, not by their own free will, they will soon lose their incentive and motivation and will not be successful in their future life. Based on a study conducted in my country, vast majorities of students who become encouraged to continue their education by their own interest have been more successful not only in their education but also in their personal life and make a progress day in day out.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that if educators allow students take what they want, they will breathe new life into students' lives and help them enhance their self-confidence. Generally phrased, myriads of students suffer from a paucity of confident and self-esteem during their lives and do not take the responsibility for their acts. But make them free in selecting what they want will certainly patronize them to improve their self-confidence and be responsible for their faults. To elucidate more on this issue, it is established beyond doubt that increase self-confidence and self-esteem will result in higher education and students would reach the pinnacle of their lives.
However, what I alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits, it has, indisputably, in order to be experienced in various realm people need to have a wide variety of knowledge about different courses. In fact, literature and imaginative courses will help students to develop their knowledge and make a progress in the various field of study. As far as I am concerned, not only can students take many advantages of imaginative courses like improve their power of brain's imagination but also can have fun and amuse during those courses.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that students should be encouraged to continue their education and reach the higher level of study. Indeed, educators should let students opt for courses by their own free will and never prevent them from their interest. In addition, if college students are required to choose different courses, it might result in low confidence and self-esteem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-23 | AAAA2222 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | kobiniloy74 | 58 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | Rida Rajani | 79 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | Lucybrian | 58 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | GREdestroyer | 66 | view |
- people who are the most deeply committed to an idea or a policy are also the most critical of it. do you agree or disagree? 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we eat today is much healthier than in the past. 90
- Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a 500-page report in only two hours; another graduate rose from an 83
- technology has made children less creative than children in the past Do you agree or disagree 64
- What is one thing you will do to improve your community 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s. However, what I alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...nts to develop their knowledge and make a progress in the various field of study. As far a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, broadly speaking, in addition, in fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2821.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 537.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25325884544 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93253462659 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450651769088 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 893.7 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4003106665 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183481428951 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673473522925 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529045194708 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122208968598 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428197515593 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.