As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I do not agree with this statement. Inevitably, living with technology is the trend of human life. Technology can help us to solve many problems, and therefore it brings a lot of convenience to our life. However, some people begin to worry about our own ability to think, claiming that with too much aid form technology, human race will lose the capability to solve problems. I cannot support this argument.
Firstly, technology itself is very complicated, and it requires intelligent to handle and improve it. Therefore the thinking ability of human being is able to be strengthened in this process. For example, when there appears a bug in a computer system, computer engineers have to come up with an idea to test this system and remove the bug. By mastering and developing technology human also develops our thinking ability.
Secondly, technology brings us more topic to think. Take artificial intelligence for example, many products based on artificial intelligence like cleaning robots and Siri are customer friendly, but they raise concerns, too. People begin to worry about their reliability while some voices even claiming that we should be alarming to their intelligence. Such considerations coming along with new technology forces people to think, and I believe this kind of thinking can actually benefit our thinking ability.
Thirdly, technology may have freed us from some traditional thinking routines such as daily arithmetic and memorizing the map, but on the other hand it helps us save time and efforts to think. That is to say, only after we do not have to spare our time to meet our basic living requirements can we be able to think freely. For instance, ancient Chinese famers were fully occupied by their farming works. Their cattle and ploughs are inefficient and they have to collect any organic waste to fertilize the soil. Therefore little children from such family were well educated back then. However, nowadays Chinese famers have modern technology to assist them in agriculture, so they have higher income and better education.
In conclusion, although I do not deny that technology do replace some of the human thinking process, I believe our capability of thinking are actually enhanced thanks to it.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 33
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 44
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 58
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s intelligent to handle and improve it. Therefore the thinking ability of human being is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 511, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ny organic waste to fertilize the soil. Therefore little children from such family were w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... do not deny that technology do replace some of the human thinking process, I believe our c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1397260274 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75203263388 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558904109589 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0462272664 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 5.21951772744 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181281042692 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601880681237 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509219950373 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111093146281 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543865543299 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.