As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
science and technology are integrated parts of today's modern world, one can not live a single moment without help of science. At what degree science affects us is contengent upon how we use the tools and instruments that are being invented by science. Nowdays we are doing a difficult task in a very easy way with the assistanc of science.but destructive activities due to malignant scientific discoveries instigates us to rethink its usefulness.
but there is no compatible argument from me why does science undermine or deteriorate human thinking. one can bring a contended thing that more craving or dependent on science will wane out ability to ponder because as we more becoming obsessed with technology, we are less able response for our own need,every task of regular work is being done by artificial intelligance . However, practical world tells us another things ,as we are going to be more innovative we can open up more space to think. While most of the people concern the bad side of science it reduces our job and obsoleted to thso who are less innovative knowledge but world are now inceasing its more scope for people and for job seekers. simlpe exmaple could help us why technology would not be liable to diminish. when simple computer was introduced around late eighties ,life was being more comportable. if people would have more engaged with technology,by rethinking to bring updated one was impossible to come in this modern world. Though technology deteriorates our thinking at certain level but deterioration at certain things are not a valuable becuase technology rises the scope to new one and more innovative one. people are thinking and sharply doing research to find out how and where we use such technology whose primary job is to assist us so that we can rethink futher how to decorate this world anew.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Science
science and technology are integrated parts of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...tigates us to rethink its usefulness. but there is no compatible argument from me...
^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ndermine or deteriorate human thinking. one can bring a contended thing that more c...
^^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , every
... are less able response for our own need,every task of regular work is being done by a...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...is being done by artificial intelligance . However, practical world tells us anoth...
^^
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... practical world tells us another things ,as we are going to be more innovative we...
^^
Line 2, column 707, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Simlpe
...e scope for people and for job seekers. simlpe exmaple could help us why technology wo...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 784, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...nology would not be liable to diminish. when simple computer was introduced around l...
^^^^
Line 2, column 840, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uter was introduced around late eighties ,life was being more comportable. if peop...
^^
Line 2, column 875, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...hties ,life was being more comportable. if people would have more engaged with tec...
^^
Line 2, column 924, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , by
... would have more engaged with technology,by rethinking to bring updated one was imp...
^^^
Line 2, column 1192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ope to new one and more innovative one. people are thinking and sharply doing research...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, another thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94805194805 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76319314014 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4398447769 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177557882881 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650791016146 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454466895729 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11353563709 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923139464279 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.