As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Nowadays technology plays significant role in our lives, and every next generation experience technology influence more and more. Some might say that it is a reason why humans' ability to think deteriorate, however, technology brings a lot of helpful tools in our life. Therefore, the topic is subjective and individual judgement is possible. I mostly agree, that technology has great impact on humans and this impact make our ability to think to exacerbate, and I will prove it using two reasons.
To begin, humans' ability to use offline devices deteriorated significantly. For example, using maps for some people is an impossible task. Moreover, to navigate somebody while the phone with Google Maps is disabled, seems to many people too hard task. Because nowadays we are using Google Maps, or other app maps, to commute, our ability to remember the road or to use map completely disappeared. There was a research conducted, were people were supposed to navigate using physical maps only, and many of them got lost. Situation like this, would not have place fifty years ago, when maps were the only helpful tool to navigate. Therefore, the claim that as people rely more and more on technology their ability to think for themselves deteriorate, is true.
Further, not only our skills to navigate without Google Maps weaken, also our ability to make simple calculation in our mind is worse. Responsible device for that change is a calculator which usage penetrated our everyday life. Furthermore, we can clearly see that while using calculator for simple calculation we do not use our own brain. Therefore, our ability to make simple multiplications, and not only, is worse and worse which is clearly seen in young generation. That is why, some schools banned calculator usage during math classes what is a good step. Based on this example, it is possible to make a conclusion that by using calculator our ability to make calculation by our own is much worse.
On the other hand, technology make some problems more complicated and it forces us to think more for ourselves. For instance, devices as iPhone or computer would never be invented if it was not for a technology. Furthermore, it broaden our spectrum of possibilities and make people to be focused on inventing and creative thinking. Another example is space exploration which is possible only because of new super computers. In this case it is a tool for humans to think our of box and calculate computation which would be impossible to solve fifty years ago. However, space exploration started in 1950, when there was no computers, so we might see that this is not a necessary tool. However, I can not fully agree with the claim that technology will surly deteriorate humans' ability to think.
In conclusion, this is a very complex topics and there are no easy answers, however, the influence of technology on our life is significant and we need to get used to living in such world. Moreover, technology might have negative effect on our ability to think, however, it can be used as a tool to more complex problems. Therefore, the judgement is subjective and there are many point of views. However, I mostly agree with the claim that technology deteriorates most people ability to think for themselves.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 70
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 66
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'whiles'.
Suggestion: whiles
...le task. Moreover, to navigate somebody while the phone with Google Maps is disabled,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...peared. There was a research conducted, were people were supposed to navigate using ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'broadens'?
Suggestion: broadens
...s not for a technology. Furthermore, it broaden our spectrum of possibilities and make ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun point seems to be countable; consider using: 'many points'.
Suggestion: many points
...e judgement is subjective and there are many point of views. However, I mostly agree with ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2729.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9799270073 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80434676548 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436131386861 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 906.3 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2311299577 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.4642857143 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39285714286 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256194298407 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846876999816 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892807285616 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167446972228 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642867389663 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.