As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate .
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The ability of thinking in humans is what separates humans from the rest of living species although other can think it is not as efficient as the human brain. In the prompt, it is stated that if humans keep relying more on technology to solve problems their ability of thinking for themselves will definitely deteriorate. However, in my opinion, I moderately disagree with this statement is true to some extent for the following reasons.
First of all, What about the people who are helping in the advancement of technology? Are they not considered humans? Since it is these humans who are developing and furthering technological advancements and performing feats that were considered impossible in the past. As stated in the prompt the statement is not applicable when the above is true.
Lastly, It is not the humans as a whole that are subjected to deteriorating in the ability to think but the people who are influenced negatively by technology who lose the ability to think and reason under specific circumstances, even though they are negatively influenced they can still think of something and it can be fixed with help of time. If the above case is considered the prompt stating that the deteriorating of ability to think in humans does not hold water.
Of course, some might argue that the given statement is true. However, it is only to a certain extent that the given statement is true even though there are people who are negatively influenced by technology, as long as there are people who make further advancements in the technological fields the ability to think in humans might not deteriorate as they are trying to progress even further in the future.
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal 60
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health related products Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in ar 78
- Which of the following activities do you think will be the most beneficial to the environment 1 Commute by biking or walking 2 Recycling 3 Eating a vegan diet 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...were considered impossible in the past. As stated in the prompt the statement is n...
^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and it can be fixed with help of time. If the above case is considered the prompt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, so, still, of course, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 283.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93639575972 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8473418423 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448763250883 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 99.597703183 60.3974514979 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297836711288 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115257857207 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915278193049 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185638231821 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105079027892 0.0667264976115 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.