As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The vacillation between the pros and cons of technology is an active discussion in our hyper technological world. Regardless of position, one cannot deny the ways in which technology has fundamentally changed the human experience. A cursory glance at the average working individual’s day proves this. From commuting to work in an automotive vehicle with an internal combustion engine, to having a work meeting through Zoom on a computer with a microchip processor, the typical human being comes into contact with technology on a regular basis. Such a world would merely be chimerical to society hundreds of years ago.
The proposed statement suggests that technology’s ultimate consequence is rather deleterious. It assumes that humanity’s reliance upon technology revokes our right and ability to be free-thinkers. However, relying on technology does not vitiate our ability to be creative, free-thinking problem-solvers. In fact, the use of technology has created new problems that did not exist prior to technological invention, demanding a need for critically thinking rectifiers and iconoclasts. For example, the invention of automotive vehicles has resulted in increased pollution, affecting the atmosphere in deleterious ways such as compromising our ozone layer and an increased rate of global warming. These challenges could not have been conceived during the days of horse carriages. Free-thinking advocates, scientists, and engineers are needed in order to develop creative solutions that fight back against these obstacles.
This segues directly into how technology has resulted in the unprecedented exchange of ideas. In many cases this exchange has allowed for progress to flourish. As an example, the existence of the internet and websites like ResearchGate has facilitated the exchange of research findings between scientists and permitted their collaboration with one another to tackle challenges in medicine and disease such as cancer immunotherapies and drug efficacies. More impressively, technology has allowed for people of varying disciplines to come together to solve problems. Take for instance biomedical engineering. Years ago, the fields of biology and engineering were perceived as mutually exclusive. However, today people are beginning to see the value in bringing scientists and engineers together to tackle problems in medicine by developing new phages to target bacterial pathogens, and even cancer-infected cells.
Furthermore, it is important to clarify the reason for humanity’s reliance on technology.
While in some ways a person can become overly dependent on technology that may hinder their own abilities (such as a student using a calculator on an exam to perform rudimentary calculations), in arguably more ways we see people using technology because of its remarkable ability to establish convenience. Our reliance on things like computers and the internet have made general research easier than ever before. To get in contact with loved ones, we simply need to dial their phone number and we can reach them wirelessly in minutes. The alternatives to these are time-consuming, tedious methods that have become obsolete thanks to the development of technology.
In summary, humanity’s reliance upon technology is one that will undoubtedly carry over for years to come. It has allowed mankind to achieve the once impossible and to tackle new challenges that do in fact require critical, creative problem-solving. While there are some concerns regarding the over-reliance of technology today, one cannot reject its instrumental role in society and its ever growing influence in the future.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 83
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain for the p 83
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ical to society hundreds of years ago. The proposed statement suggests that tec...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t fight back against these obstacles. This segues directly into how technology...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nks to the development of technology. In summary, humanity’s reliance upon tec...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3107.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6697080292 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25813847579 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 1004.4 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.86863928 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.074074074 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2962962963 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226771169412 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595681018684 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556309429845 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114894827051 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307658186712 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 183.0 100.480337079 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.