As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This statement considers negatively human thinking with the consequences in the 19th century and now. Considering that people used technologies in the past without serious consequences, it is clear that they will not have them in the future. By starting investing through technology, humans are not suffered from walking through the street to the nearest bank or hedge fund. Even with the mobile phone, big companies such as Apple and Samsung are providing more developed technologies.
The statement attempts to claim that by improving the technology level, the reduction of human thinking will decreased. The assumption for this is that with reliance on technology, humans will not have work to do. According to the introduction, one could argue that people can pass away from investing and phones, the hypothetical worker needs to find alternatives platform and communication. These short-circuit technologies make these problems obsolete.
However, reliance on technology does not necessarily preclude the human ability to think creatively. Recent developments are generated to make life simpler. Using cars and phones make people’s life more convenient by being able to do tasks and human being needs efficiently. This efficiency does not preclude humans to do work by themselves. In fact, technology frees humanity to not only tackle problems, but also to create new issues that did not exist without technology. For example, in the past, most of the human population was outraged from investing and they could simply visit the stock table since they are not able to know the skill set to invest, meaning that only professionals might invest in stocks and bonds. Subsequently, stock tables are integrated into mobile phones lately with online courses on the topic of investing now which is leading to a better economic level. The solution to these problems required creative imagination and critical thinking of the workers.
In contrast to the statement, we can see how mobile phones are developing through the years. By starting from Web 2.0 services, we come to the Web 3.0 version, meaning that humans will have a safe internet connection between services. Moreover, the thinking of human nature created medical forums with specific diseases and symptoms to make life easier for the doctor since people will be informed about his problem before a visit. For example, the recent large world-wide problem was coronavirus which is one of the major global diseases that happened in world history. By implementing new technologies, our scientists and doctors are created new vaccines which caused less number of human being deceased.
The last example provides hope for the future generation that can use technologies in the appropriate level. By increasing our reliance on technology, impossible goals can be achieved. Consider how people in the early 21st century witnessed to complete elimination of coronavirus. This disease is considered as dangerous since there were many death numbers.
Technology will always mark the human routine from the beginning of development to the implementation of nanotechnologies. Given the history of technology, there will be an infinite amount of problems that the human generation needs to solve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...l, the reduction of human thinking will decreased. The assumption for this is that with r...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in contrast, in fact, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2753.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41929133858 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92059851482 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531496062992 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8351982599 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.962962963 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8148148148 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228922868396 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629027225403 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044193164482 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127361965377 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380998339408 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.