People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
In around the world, there is various kind of authority. Some of them are very generous, some are autonomous or oppressive. Every authority has their individual legislative power to regime an institution. I strongly agree with this argument for questioning the rule of authority when it is opposite of general people’s benefit.
Firstly, for example, everybody knows about “ The International Mother Language” movement which was one of the greatest achievements for Bangladesh. The Pakistani (former West Pakistan) wanted to suppress the Bengali language from the Bangladeshi (former East Pakistan) where most of the Bangladeshi was speaking in Bengali. Moreover, Pakistani wanted to assign Urdu as an official language. But, East Pakistan protested against this decision and Pakistani government became violent. They killed young student who attends this protest. Then, many young students broke the law against Pakistani and protest more intensively and finally after many years later Bengali became the official language. So, without questioning social change and shaping of the future is impossible.
Secondly, some might argue with questioning authority can lead a violent action which is not beneficial for the citizen. Action can isolate people into two groups which increase misunderstanding, violation in a country. As a result, segregation, disorder and hindrance of the progress of a country. Take an instance, India ruled by British colony for almost for 200 years. The citizen of India was repressive by oppressive dictator of the British government. One of the greatest leader Mohan Das Gandhi first raised voice against British for their injustices. He also believed in non-violent protest and encouraged millions of Indian to attend in this protest. After many years back, British leaved India and India became independent.
On the other hand, government is not always acting evil action. If the action is beneficial for the individual citizen then the individual should agree with the government. For example, in our country, Bangladesh has a law that every child must be gone to school and education is free for girls up to higher secondary level. If people disagree with this governmental decision then it will be harmful for future generation. Therefore, people should not always oppose authority without understanding the big picture.
To conclude, opposition is essential for developing a better country but if the decision is harmful for the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | vibhu04 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | hridi123456 | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | Walia Farzana | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | Shashwat Singh | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | pyash | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your a 77
- tpo 31A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some paleontologists interpret 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppor 70
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products."Previous experience has shown that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are h 30
- Tpo 52 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52094240838 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92734424286 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568062827225 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9257103188 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.36 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.28 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136143112304 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382358093086 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666024074332 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08014346324 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731923685043 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.14 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.