People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As the world becomes more and more advanced, people are encouraged to choose their own path of life. Focusing on what you like rather than working for the preconceived notions of success. However, we must still look at problems objectively and make decisions because what we like is
heavily dependent on our current state of mind.
Before I make my points, let me clarify my view on what a good decision is; A good decision is something that outweighs the other options in their positive effects/least negative effects for the long term. this may either be physical (investing in a good company and not in the one
you fancy) or mental ( taking a deep breath instead of smacking your despot boss in the face).
Firstly, emotional decision-makers make a lot more mistakes than others and don't change as time progresses. Whenever they justify their reason it never adds up. we must understand that we may never be able to make all of our decisions objectively and sometimes our emotions take over. For example, a person on a diet buys a pizza after their 3rd day. These decisions are sometimes necessary to keep our minds in a healthy state.
As they say, 'pride cometh before fall'. When you justify a decision made emotionally you try to defend your decision rather than analyze it and then you make more bad decisions. this becomes a losing cycle that just spirals downwards.
I conclude by saying that, emotional decision-makers must analyze rather than justify
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | vishva24 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '/ the least'.
Suggestion: / the least
... other options in their positive effects/least negative effects for the long term. thi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ast negative effects for the long term. this may either be physical investing in a g...
^^^^
Line 6, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and not in the one you fancy or mental taking a deep breath instead of smacking...
^^
Line 9, column 77, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ake a lot more mistakes than others and dont change as time progresses. Whenever the...
^^^^
Line 12, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...t and then you make more bad decisions. this becomes a losing cycle that just spiral...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 12.9106741573 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65991278052 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8638735603 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8571428571 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263720449926 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857514287428 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772896335067 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119856847303 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713458047111 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.