People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans are by our very nature emotional beings. No matter how enlightened we think we have become at our base level we experience the world with deep emotions. We laugh when having a good time with friends and cry during bad days or events. Our emotions have helped us survive for millenia. Those that are able to push down those emotions in the heat of decision making are to be applauded, but that does not mean that they are superior. I disagree with the prompt and will elucidate my stance in the following paragraphs.
Poor decision making does not only entail the involvment of emotions in the thought process, although that has been a common culprit. It is having access to all the facts and information necessary to come to an informed and rational decision and still choosing to go the opposite way or not knowing how to put those pieces together. Decisions made in the heat of the moment generally have no logical basis behind them, but that does not make them bad decisions. Justifications can certainly be made after the fact if the pathway between the emotional choice and the rational one is the same. If someone rear-ended my car at an intersection and then drove off, my immediate reaction would be to follow after. This is certainly an emotional decision but my justification for that will be proven true.
A good decision maker can separate their emotions from the task or challenge at hand and drive forwards towards the goal. But must that be the only way? Can the strategic input of our emotions into our decision making enable us to make better choices? There has to be a method of reasoning and thinking that will allow us to factor in the emotional aspect of any action. "How does this choice make me feel?". "Would I be happier if I was to walk down this path?". These are bgood questions that cannot be avoided when embarking on the journey of reasoning. The options can then be weighed against logic and juxtaposed to determine the best course of action.
It is important to note that emotional decision making can be an effective way of approaching challenges, but it is up to the individual concerned to determine whether this is an appropriate course to be taken. The disparity between the purely rational thinker and the emotional one might not be as far as the prompt suggests. This does not make either such people bad decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- In any field field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make meaningful contributions 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 54
- In all levels of education affection should be focused first on theory in order for students to understand the concepts rather than practical s to what extent do you agree or disagree 50
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 58
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75539568345 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63750596729 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520383693046 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9986681359 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2173913043 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1304347826 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.34782608696 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20701934138 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633378842702 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504103268712 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134722815839 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020868616146 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.