The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to dowith the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his orher inherent skills and abilities.

Essay topics:

The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do

with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or

her inherent skills and abilities.

Political leaders need to be judged based on the challenges faced by them and not on their God-given skills or abilities. Any leader is expected to be prepared to face any kind of challenges that might come in their way. If someone has not faced many challenges in their own life they will not be prepared to face them as leader of a community. Challenges shape an individual's character and strengthens their will power. For example, people like Abraham Lincoln have faced many challenges which lead him to be a great leader. Even in the Mahatma Gandhi's case, it is said that he has decided to fight the discrimination of British only after facing the racism himself.

Some might argue that many people face challenges in this world and not all of them be considered great leaders. While it is true that difficulties are an omnipresent reality of human life, overcoming these difficulties is never a wasted effort. In every person's case, they definetly shape leadership qualities on some level or other. While some people become qualify to be a family head and some to lead a small community or village, in every case people most experienced with facing challenges are better suited to be leaders.

Skills are not the most important in a leader. This can be seen by in every society. Skillfull people like economists, mathematicians and othe technical staff are meant to work under the orders of a good leader chosen by people in a democratic society. Your qualifications do not get you far in politics in a democratic nation. People who are percieved to be great based on the challenges they have faced, like Nelson Mandela, are choosen to lead them irrespective of their skillset. While people with skillsets are expected to work on under these leaders.

We can hence conculde that, while abilities and skills are important in a society they are not a foremost priority in a leader. A leader with no skills can be a great leader of a skillful population.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-05 Sushanth Reddy 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Sushanth Reddy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y challenges in their own life they will not be prepared to face them as leader o...
^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...er of a community. Challenges shape an individuals character and strengthens their will po...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...politics in a democratic nation. People who are percieved to be great based on the chal...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 485, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ad them irrespective of their skillset. While people with skillsets are expected to w...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then, while, for example, kind of, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84319526627 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74551749607 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48224852071 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6135430188 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9444444444 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281238661569 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103207385286 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098126818789 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182413627761 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094131590284 0.0667264976115 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.