"Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interested
in their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose at
least some of their privacy
The significance of retaining the privacy both for eminent people and ordinary persons is not stealthy for anyone. Among diversified constellation of perspectives, some may regard that the luminaries should be aware of missing their privacy and they should not be appalled. On the contrary, other people persevere in unravelling the notion that the privacy is a worthwhile possession in each person’s life without any exceptions between the famous or regular person. Being as popular persons does not mean abandoning one’s private life or it does not seem logical to sacrifice all aspects of life just for one thing. Based on this interpretation, the angle of privacy goes beyond the boundaries of just the general public.
To inaugurate, first consider the respect people hold for eradicating one’s private life in lieu of being famous. To shed more light on this issue, having disseminated all details of one’s life among the general public, the fame cannot pursue their normal and regular life like as previous time. Thus, poking others’ noises in eminent persons may leave detrimental impact not only their personal lives, but also all adjacent individuals living and working near them. In fact, how can one ignore the role of invasion privacy in famous persons? In long terms, the splendid facets of being a fame whom everyone can know us will be attenuated and the obsessions of being annoyed owing to others’ judgment can be highlighted in our life which may leave adverse consequents.
To converge on the Idea about conserving the privacy for all persons, accessing a tranquilizing life-style can be scrutinized aptly. To put in general words, only when one, far from his genre or position in society, feel a sense of security and serenity in the environment in which he live, can it be anticipated that he will achieve a spirit of ecstasy and savor each moment of his life. Simply stated, the most predominant dimension in one’s life is observing the world through positive windows in order to reach a pinnacle of accomplishment. Thus, to surmount the negative side of spreading the mysteries about one’ life, the aspect of feeling calm can be deemed as one of determining factor.
The latter angle demystifying the verified issue is how to provide the balance and harmony between the professional and personal life. To delineate, based on one scientific research conducted in a psychological province, the more the susceptibility of existence of harmony in one’s life, the less prevalence of depression and anxiety will be dominated. Hence, considering the privacy both in repute persons and general public propelling toward the prosperity and triumph is another must. Going into the depth, seldom does one famous person take giant steps toward the balance life without owing the chance of enjoying the privileges of maintaining his privacy. Therefore, here the importance of privacy in keeping your life away from heterogeneous life-style which badger you can be totally comprehended.
Drawing upon the enumerated reasons, the benefits of setting privacy not only in ordinary ones but also in luminaries are too enormous to fathom. To recapitulate, not only do the repute persons feel a sense of serenity and security, but also, they may be predisposed to a surge of homogeneous concepts in their personal and professional life.
(543 words)
- "Public figures such as actors, politicians, and athletes should expect people to be interestedin their private lives. When they seek a public role, they should expect that they will lose atleast some of their privacy 83
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps, a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bact 16
- Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 16
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 72
- People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation,which motivates people much more than individual competition does. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 718, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... goes beyond the boundaries of just the general public. To inaugurate, first consider the res...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ll details of one's life among the general public, the fame cannot pursue their normal an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... the privacy both in repute persons and general public propelling toward the prosperity and tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in fact, in general, for one thing, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2858.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24403669725 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94479350215 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521100917431 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 924.3 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2618368102 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.095238095 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9523809524 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169282230502 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559630805253 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576642815605 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10741483827 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545673206681 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.