Pursuing a financially stable career tends to inhibit creativity and innovation.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In our increasingly technology-driven world, the issue of creativity in the workplace is a popular topic of discussion. It is a common misperception that those who choose financially lucrative careers give up opportunities for artistic growth and innovation. In fact, pursuing jobs associated with monetary gains can foster creativity both within and outside of the work environment.
Entering into a fiscally stable job can oftentimes not only provide opportunity for creativity, but can also require imagination. Firstly, not all artists are starving. Many of the most popular, successful performing artists are paid just as well as workers in more traditional fields, such as lawyers and bankers. Yuja Wang, for example, a world-renowned pianist rakes in a few million dollars a year performing on an international concert circuit. Additionally, the typical salary for the highest-ranking dancers in the New York City Ballet is estimated at about two hundred thousand dollars a year, comparable to an associate attorney’s salary at a high-paying New York City corporate law firm. It is simply wrong to assume that all artistically-driven careers are financially unstable.
Furthermore, many office jobs not commonly perceived as creative, increasingly encourage workers to pursue activities that will bring innovative ideas to the table. Many technology firms, for example, provide on-the-job opportunities for their employees to engage in problem-solving activities with colleagues to stimulate creative thinking. Google provides brainstorming sessions for account executives where employees engage in friendly games of ping pong with each other to blow off steam and bounce ideas off each other. Law firms also facilitate creative problem-solving by allowing workers freedom to re-organize the structure of legal briefs. The growing technology field not only provides for an increasing amount of imaginative thinking in the workplace, but also more “traditional” jobs encourage out-of-the-box solutions to common problems.
Those who fear that our society is drifting away from creative capability may argue that workers with artistic capabilities are often lured from creative pursuits by monetary gains in more traditional careers. While it is clear that not all financially lucrative careers are devoid of imaginative freedom, this argument similarly ignores opportunities that lie outside of the workplace. Engaging in a job that does not allow for artistic capability does not limit a person’s potential for contributing to an innovative society. Citizens have possibilities to pursue extracurricular activities including online journaling or participating in art classes. Furthermore, philanthropists and museum-goers facilitate creative exchange by supporting and engaging in artistic enterprises without having to pursue an imaginative job themselves.
While fiscally-stable careers might be considered a hindrance to one’s creative potential, most contemporary jobs not only provide opportunities for artistic exploration, but also require workers to solve problems creatively. Additionally, while some artists are paid extremely well, pursuing a more traditional, financially sound career does not mean forgoing creative freedom within or beyond the workplace. In a society where technology is increasingly challenging what we believe possible, an innovative mindset will prove even more valuable in the future.
- Pursuing a financially stable career tends to inhibit creativity and innovation Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 88
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you either agree or disagree with t 70
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 55
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- “A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the pos 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...prove even more valuable in the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2971.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00202020202 5.05705443957 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53350947577 2.79657885939 126% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 949.5 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5931928487 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.045454545 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114903364425 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377857164938 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266264538991 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771181091599 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224873871011 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 48.8420337079 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.82 12.1639044944 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.