Scandal are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could

Essay topics:

Scandal are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.

Admittedly, scandals are useful, improving the management level in the political field. If had no scandal in the political field, governments should not have any reformation in the country. Through scandal, people can make leaders of the country pressed to enhance the performance of management. An effective scandal can force government introspection, leading them to change for people, to create more benefits for the public. Even if the governments have supreme power in the country, they could not ignore people’s force. The Watergates scandal, a major political scandal in the United States, is a good example of this view, which finally leads the U.S supreme court to make a series of reformations to guarantee the security of the country. In other words, scandal is an effective means in the political field because it attracts public attention, which makes government reforming.

However, society overly depends on the scandal to inspect the government in the long term, which will let the government failing to keep its promise to people. when people distrust the government, society is in danger, because the government cannot use any power to balance the society disturbing. As a result, implacable societal problems will cause a series of threats to people. Such serious problems that we should prevent them from happening. The overly dependent on scandal could not be an effective means, whereas reformer could make society progressing in the long term, which is unable for scandal. A good reformer uses their methods to improve society gradually, although it is so slow as not to be aware of in the short term. In short, the scandal could not be a useful method to improve society in the long term.

Finally, if we take the economic field into account, we could find there are some problems. Even a series of big scandals appear every day, it is easy to find that society has no improvement from the economic angle. we should reckon what is the main problems, but not use the scandal to threaten the government overly. The economic improvement is not relative to scandal, but original to country development. Whether scandals are more or less, it is not an effective method. But, is there someone who can make the national prosperous? It is the reformers. Reformers could practically reform the country’s development, boosting the national economy. Without reformers, the country’s economy is hard to improve because there is not reformation that can facilitate country development. In sum, scandal is not a useful mean to improve society from an economy angle.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-18 Juhong Park 66 view
2023-07-20 s.sim 50 view
2023-07-20 s.sim 50 view
2023-07-11 Technoblade 83 view
2023-07-11 Jonginn 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Andy_84 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 656, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...of this view, which finally leads the U.S supreme court to make a series of refor...
^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... failing to keep its promise to people. when people distrust the government, society...
^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...no improvement from the economic angle. we should reckon what is the main problems...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, whereas, in short, as a result, in other words, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15201900238 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79423976302 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472684085511 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1715073155 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5416666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.79166666667 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230400559113 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716682329748 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422634169699 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16305717381 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00914647963974 0.0667264976115 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.