Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other area-can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals are virtually ubiquitous; aside from politics, even in scientific academia, the one that is often deemed the most objective field, is a various type of scandals. I personally agree with the statement that scandals truly have some advantages in drawing the attention of people in its whimsical but unique way.
Granted, scandals can often have a negative impact on society. For example, in case of dealing with COVID, the scandal associated with the vaccine hampered the US government to ameliorate the problems with the public health and the economy. When Moderna invented the groundbreaking mRNA vaccine, some hidebound politicians and partisans deliberately slandered that it is ineffective, or even noxious, to the patients who suffer from COVID. Consequently, nearly half of the US citizens did not get vaccinated, and this lagged the US’s overcoming the pandemic. As this example reveals, there are some occasions where negative ramifications are produced by scandals.
Nonetheless, it should be noted that scandals often inform us the hitherto neglected issues. The issue regarding the scientific integrity might epitomize this perspective. It is now considered to be granted that nearly every scientific articles should undergo a punctilious peer-review process, but in fact the reviewing process was engendered by a serious of scandal of the data manipulation. Furthermore, the recent issue about the papers of high-temperature superconductivity and Majorana zero mode that were withdrawn from one of the most prominent scientific journal has also contributed to the increase of the research ethnics of the science academia. Owing to their high prominence, the fact that most of the data of them were manipulated has shocked the entire scientific society, leading the tendency of high-profile journals’ requiring the authors to provide the raw data that can reproduce the results of the paper. Therefore, scandals can contribute to society in a positive way by disseminating the issue regarding itself.
In summary, albeit scandals can give negative results to the society, it can also give merits through informing citizens about the problem. Therefore, rather than simply dismissing scandals, people should try to understand the underlying issue that triggered them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 66
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or mig 16
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 973, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ore, scandals can contribute to society in a positive way by disseminating the issue regarding it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in fact, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57020057307 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09091901328 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581661891117 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.911621598 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.21951772744 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115354138605 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398830696523 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386963647598 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737544035303 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199290733443 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.38706741573 124% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.