Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The prompt claims that Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. The given claim is contentious because different people may have disparate opinions and positions. Some may go for the claim, while others cannot argue with it at all. I disagree with the claim that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. The three reasons and examples to support my position on the given claim is presented in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, scandals violets mora values; they spread negative way to raise voices and for attention of problems. Yes, it is true that speaker and reformer should focus on the current problems of public but the way scandals focus public’s attention on problems is wrong. Thus, scandals are not useful because they focus our attention on problems by forgetting moral values. For instance, Sarita, a social activist, used to raise voices, she focused our attention on problems in very aggressive ways which leads public to violet the moral values; which is definitely wrong for long term progress in the society.
Furthermore, scandals provoke public not to follow rules and standard in the society just for attention on problems. It is true that speaker and reformers should address the problems of public and definitely scandals might help somehow but in real scenario it helps to detach public from rules and standards of the society which will lead in wrong direction. Therefore, scandals are not useful. For example, Biplav has different view about the social norms and values so he raised voice in impassioned way just for our attention on problems but now its negative impacts is seeing in the society such as relationship of public and speaker and reformer is weak.
However, some argues that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in a way that no speaker and reformer ever could. While we cannot deny that scandals have no any significance in the society, the way they approach is serious issue. It might solve some current problems but in long term it harms development and progress of society. For instance, we considered Punya Gautam is very useful for us because he focused our attention on problems but later negative consequences really hurts the progression of society. Speaker and reformers do morally, they do not use negative way just for our attention on the problems. Hence, scandals are not useful only because they focus our attention on the problems.
In summation, the reasons and examples presented support my position on the claim that I disagree on the claim that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on the problems in a way that no speaker and reformer ever could. Essay illustrates the reasons such as mora values, rules and standards and negative impacts which scandals follow. Examples of Sarita, Biplav, and Punya shows that way of scandals are not useful.
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 66
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 54
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated are far more successful than are other methods at deterring cheat 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...While we cannot deny that scandals have no any significance in the society, the wa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2508.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02605210421 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52799236919 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.362725450902 0.4932671777 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3073135289 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6818181818 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446761004005 0.243740707755 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181060249785 0.0831039109588 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154467469878 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309390681255 0.150359130593 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998495771225 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.