Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The argument claims that scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer could. I disagree with this statement for the following reasons.
First of all, scandals are sensational, thus they may have negative effect on the public. Just like tabloids depicting celebrities’ private lives are popular than magazines conveying strictly censored information, people could be easily affected by scandals. Scandals often resulted from lack of morality. For instance, if the scandals of governors taking bribery to allow constructions with environmental concern out broke very often, the reaction of the public may ebb by times. Therefore making the bribery and lack of concern of environment become normal. The trend of the society may also be harmful for the education.
Furthermore, since scandals are easy to catch people’s eyes, more important things are going to be neglected. To illustrate, when the public are crazy about following the sex scandal of a congressman, the television, news paper will be stuffed with news about it. People may forget about the food security problem which ones face everyday.
Surely, scandals may unveil things which needs to be scrutinize by the public. However, structural problem is not going to be solved. Most of the time, we can only see things happening without being able to do anything about it. When we see a governor who is taking bribery on news, we may not vote for him/her again. However, the environment causing the bribery will not change.
Therefore, scandals are not useful because they have generally negative effect on public, more important things may be neglected, and they will not solve the structural problem behind it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 68
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 33
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 33
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...eaction of the public may ebb by times. Therefore making the bribery and lack of concern ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: NEWS_PAPER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newspaper'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: newspaper
...andal of a congressman, the television, news paper will be stuffed with news about it. Peo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e food security problem which ones face everyday. Surely, scandals may unveil things...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 278.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27697841727 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70788777042 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4297976635 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2941176471 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218488431746 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750034488551 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103712385704 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158219413964 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12639460825 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.