Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The prompt states one of the benefits of scandal as being able to emphasize on the problems in a way which otherwise no speaker or reformer can. A scandal is an immoral act which can cause a public outrage. Scandals help bring the misconstrued reality about people into the public eyes. Certainly, one can agree with statement after the following reasons are considered.
Scandals do divert people’s attention to themselves. They expose the activities that are generally surreptitious in an attempt to expose the reality behind the events. Many a times, it leads to the public outrage and creates a negative image of the people involved in it. Scandals make people focus on problems in a different way, that is, by the means of exposing the reality. For example, the Watergate scandal, which is one of the most notorious scandals in USA, caught a lot of public attention and is the one of those scandals that made a huge impact. This scandal made Richard Nixon, the President of USA at that time, to resign from the office.
Scandals offer an alternative way to draw public attention which even the renowned speakers or reformers cannot. This is certainly true as scandals tend to expose the reality which is kept secretive usually by the means of videos, images, and documents. These, in contrast to the words spoken by reformers, are certainly a stronger proof for the immoral acts. Proofs which are undeniable would obviously gain more attention than the mere words, which are hard to believe as they can be driven by acrimony.
Scandals, even though they tend to cause people focus on the existing problems such as bribery, are not useful everytime. This is because they tend to expose the problems and not solve them. Scandals have brought out the events happening behind the scenes such as bribery, racial inequalities, and a lot more, but has done a little to solve them. This is because it is completely dependent on the people who are in charge of taking severe actions. For example, if no action is taken on a scandal that tends to expose a specific case of bribery, then, even though it did expose a particular person, it did no harm to him/her. These kind of scandals then become a waste. Also, a scandal just brings a particular case to the people’s eyes, but it cannot solve the problems that are pre-existing as they are generic.
Summing up all of the above paragraphs, one can say that scandals do help bring the furtive activities into the limelight in a way that no speaker or reformer ever could. Although sometimes, it is not useful, but generally it exposes the people mired in it thus bringing people’s attention on the prevailing problems. Therefore, one can agree with this prompt about scandals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 50
- In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 58
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East M 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 54
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura Sock Inc A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our socks are s 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...ose the reality behind the events. Many a times, it leads to the public outrage and cre...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... Scandals make people focus on problems in a different way, that is, by the means of exposing the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 626, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...ular person, it did no harm to him/her. These kind of scandals then become a waste. Also, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sting as they are generic. Summing up all of the above paragraphs, one can say that scan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in contrast, kind of, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2269.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83795309168 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61239019667 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473347547974 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.417635647 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5416666667 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5416666667 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 5.13820224719 370% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248228582116 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753215095261 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590420950225 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152179854814 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337527663044 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.