Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Can science and technology evolve to the stage, that all of the society's problems would ber solved? In order to critically answer this question, it is necessary to answer the assumption, that it is possiblem to evolve to the stage that all problem can be solved, as well as analyse, who is the true solved behind the problems.
First of all, it is necessary to state, that technology and sciency are certainly helping to solve more and more problems as they evolve. Both of them tend to solve more complicated problem each time, and facilitate our daily lives in ways we were not familiar with before. In middleage it was certainly unthinkable to travel from Paris to London in two hours and in the future it might be even less and so on. So if evolution continue by applying stated narrative, it is to expect, that both, technology and science, will be able to solve increasing number of society 's problems.
What is however also very obvious, that they are always more problems coming after solving the previous one. The only difference is, that the distant future problem are not directly seen as there are still one more problem to solve beforehand. Nowadays, we might be trying to solveplenty of problems related to ecology, as poluted megacities, however, after solving the issue, another one will cetainly be in hand. The problem of poluted cities and other places is definitely solvable by new technological principles as electric cars or better harvesting and not burning the soil after the season. These technology is morover created according to the newest scientific findings. However, as science evolve, we are also conscios in more areas and finding problems we did not think about before. Seventy years ago, ecology was not considered as an issue seventy years ago, what does not mean, that the issue was not present, especialy after the industrial revolution. It is, therefore, the matter of the perpetuating evolution what keep improving the technology and science, however make us conscios about new problems.
Moreover, technology is neither evolving by itself, in the same way as science. Behind the great finding is always human mind, and evethough technology is a great facilitator in dealing with society's problems, there is always human mind behind it, looking for another and another problem to solve. Science is not isolated organism neither. It is the construct created by human and everyting what science can solve at the moment was criated by human researcher in the past. Technology and science will therefore never be able to solve all the problems in society, as the real and true player is human mind, even hiding behind.
The position could be chalenged, on ground of the certain nuances, however, few can deny that the problems are evolving with humanity and therefore it is not possible to have them all solved. After one problem solved, another two occur. Neither can be challanged the assumption, that behing every new technology, as well as behind each scientific finding, human mastermind can be found. Therefore, the true solver is human and technology as well as science is only a tool human created in orther to facilitate the solution.
It cannot be denied therefore, that both, science and technology, have helped us solved plenty convoluted problems and are greatly facilitated our ever day lives by not dealing with such a problems anymore. However, it cannot be denied neither, there there are more problems to come, we are not even aware of, and that the true solver behind is always human.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 66
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 66
- Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. 55
- The city of Winston has two large department stores: Namen and Roscoe. Namen is known for its high-end designer fashions, while Roscoe is known for more affordable fashion options. Both Namen and Roscoe are each considering opening another store in the gr 55
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nd technology evolve to the stage, that all of the societys problems would ber solved? In ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 599, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'These technologies'?
Suggestion: This technology; These technologies
... not burning the soil after the season. These technology is morover created according to the new...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 31, column 188, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a problem' or simply 'problems'?
Suggestion: a problem; problems
...ever day lives by not dealing with such a problems anymore. However, it cannot be denied n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 31, column 246, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: there
.... However, it cannot be denied neither, there there are more problems to come, we are not e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, as well as, first of all, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 46.0 19.5258426966 236% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2987.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 593.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0370994941 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93473315629 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60499841426 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43676222597 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 946.8 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.945074289 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.48 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.72 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327031854811 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10020541201 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833752995645 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186782654649 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055193686116 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.