Skill alone, no matter how great, does not guarantee a masterpiece
Have you ever wondered why even though Bill and Clinton are the ones you could approach for a mechanic job, you will always prefer one to the other? Maybe you may have thought about approaching Clinton but you find out he actually does not have a university degree, But Bill, on the other hand, is both a mechanic and a university graduate in Mechanical engineering and has done a bit of university research in the field and has made a name for himself. I guess it’s safe to say that more people will be seen navigating toward Bill while making the effort to consciously avoid Clinton for the sake of errors. The prompt recommends that even the greatest skill cannot guarantee a masterpiece. Well in my view, I strongly agree with this stance and argue that there is a lot more one has to do, in order than merely having the skills to be able to master a thing for the following reasons.
A person’s character says all about a person, a certain type of character frequently updated to what is most needed is a very necessary key for success. Many times people would tell you all you have to do is master the skill, I agree with that, but you also need to master a good character in order to be able to properly deliver the skill. Take for example Cristiano Ronaldo, He is one of the most skillful football players to ever grace the 21st century, however possessing these great skills is not the only cause of his success. Cristiano is a disciplinarian that has always kept to time while training, is always the first to take a lead role for the team, and fires other players to do the same. I can correctly tell you that his disciplined character is one of the reasons many football clubs want him and the reason for his success. From the life of Cristiano, I can say that good character in addition to being highly skillful is necessary for success.
Furthermore, it is usually said that the ring of connections that a person keeps is likely going to be a limiting factor for them. A person can possess the skills required to be successful, however, is not properly connected and managed and might end up not being successful. Nigeria as a country has suffered from this. From the early 1900s up until now, Nigeria as a country has lost a lot of skillful individuals because these individuals in those times did not have a plethora of necessary management and connections in order to be successful. The scenario is a living case. It explains that one can be very skillful but become less successful than a non-skilled person in a particular field only because he is not connected to or managed by the right persons or set of people. In cases like this, we can see that being highly skillful is not enough.
People say that once you have the skills, it’s in you forever and you can never lose the skills, and definitely one day, it is going to pan out properly for you. This may sound as somewhat true and correct but it has been confirmed that many skillful people live in abject poverty, regardless of what skill area they are in. It brings me to the conclusion that having the Skill is a great start, but most of the time, it is not enough.
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 66
- Skill alone no matter how great does not guarantee a masterpiece 66
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens 66
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 62
- Skill alone no matter how great does not guarantee a masterpiece 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, as to, for example, i guess, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 575.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49043478261 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51234592395 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457391304348 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 809.1 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6946186634 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.952380952 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.380952381 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101082109733 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383596329315 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424156476172 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671153980946 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116805767567 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.