Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the
societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of
corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
The author of the statement provided above has reported two different views about the responsibility of corporations. In particular, the former argues that they should care more about the general welfare of their societies, while the latter affirms that they should only deal with members’ economic business.
As far as I am concerned, I tend to mostly agree with the first perspective, as an exclusive focus on the economy situation could lead to future troubles due to disorganization. In this essay I am going to explain deeply my own vision.
First of all, as I have already mentioned, it is fundamental to operate not only with the conscience of the present, but also keeping an eye warned on the future. To put it in another way: if corporations had as only objective the richness of the companies involved, the system would work just for a short time. Indeed, even if it may be argued that having much money is always an advantage, the truth of the matter is that, if the fortune is not properly managed, it may be wasted in an instant.
In addition, it is also important to keep in mind the historical aim of corporations, that is to coordinate the personal interests of involved companies. In particular, associations’ duty has been, since the origins, to keep in shape relationships among societies working in the same field. For this reason, it can be hard to imagine a corporation whose primary aim is to make money.
On the other side of the argument, the economy of the society should not be totally overlooked.
As a matter of fact, if several administrators realized that cooperation between different firms leads to mutual improvement, they would be more likely to continue leaning on one another. Some realistic examples of this are posters and trusts which help to avoid the monopoly of one single company.
In conclusion, I am entirely convinced that, even if it is deeply important for corporation to help their members to collaborate, the economic side of the argument should not be left aside, but it should be used as a way to make cooperation even stronger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | rookobay | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Ifthekhar | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 67 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 61
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 54
- The problem of poor teacher performance that has plagued the state s public school systems is bound to become a good deal less serious in the future The state has initiated comprehensive guidelines that oblige teachers to complete a number of required cre 58
- The debate over public smoking has raised a number of public policy issues most prominently in the areas of public health economics and personal rights Few people dispute the health risks of cigarette smoking Smokers assume risks every time they light up 48
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89075630252 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96221632844 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2756200843 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193604071107 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559934383276 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356216281822 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788674469181 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370513757141 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.