Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
From my point of view, every country citizen shares his own portion of responsibility for his actions. The same should apply to corporations: essentially groups of people, united by the same goal. As corporations grow they acquire more power and may start to significantly influence the well-being of the societies where they work. Correct government legal policies should thus restrain corporations from doing much harm accidentally.
First of all, there is an idea that the goal of corporations is only to make money of their businesses. I don’t agree with that. The similar egocentric vision, when applied to one human, is commonly treated as vicious. Why shouldn’t it be the case for corporations? For example, one of the global health problems in the world today is related to tobacco smoking. In the 20th century ‘scientific’ researches existed, that claimed the absence of any harm for humans caused by cigarettes. However, today we may know that these studies were fake and were promoted by the owners of large tobacco brands. It is hard to estimate exactly the amount of deaths (e.g. from lung cancer, chance of which, as we know today, is strongly corellated with smoking) for which these business holders are responsible for. However, they were lawsuited in the USA and penaltied for their deceptive claims.
Every huge company is responsible in some way for our health. Those companies that promote junky food advertising it as healthy, are certainly responsible for that - this, of course, doesn’t cancel the responsibility of any particular human who has chosen to eat this food. This thesis applies particularly to the pharmaceutic companies. During the pandemics in 2020, when the vaccine was not developed yet, there was a lot of advertisement of some medicals recommended to Covid-19 patients. All of those didn’t work because Covid-19 is virus and methods which work to resist bacterial diseases, don’t have any power against viruses. But nevertheless they were strongly promoted and a lot of people bought it for high prices, hoping for better. The pharma corporations that made profit out of this situations, should be faced with responsibility for their malicious actions.
Finally, I think that it would be extremely non-ethical to claim that corporations should care only about money. Both legal and ethical responsibility should be exerted upon those companies that try to make profit in deceptive and harmful ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | rookobay | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Ifthekhar | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | shubham1102 | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 70
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'But'.
Suggestion: But
..., don’t have any power against viruses. But nevertheless they were strongly promoted and a lot o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ma corporations that made profit out of this situations, should be faced with respon...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, i think, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24681933842 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93033687119 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0100891489 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7272727273 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8636363636 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219519445658 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603070277123 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054889164528 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137023714884 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209351762788 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.