Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the
societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of
corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
The author of the statement provided above has reported two different views about the responsibility of corporations. In particular, the former argues that they should care more about the general welfare of their societies, while the latter affirms that they should only deal with members’ economic business.
As far as I am concerned, I tend to mostly agree with the first perspective, as an exclusive focus on the economy situation could lead to future troubles due to disorganization. In this essay I am going to explain deeply my own vision.
First of all, as I have already mentioned, it is fundamental to operate not only with the conscience of the present, but also keeping an eye warned on the future. To put it in another way: if corporations had as only objective the richness of the companies involved, the system would work just for a short time. Indeed, even if it may be argued that having much money is always an advantage, the truth of the matter is that, if the fortune is not properly managed, it may be wasted in an instant.
In addition, it is also important to keep in mind the historical aim of corporations, that is to coordinate the personal interests of involved companies. In particular, associations’ duty has been, since the origins, to keep in shape relationships among societies working in the same field. For this reason, it can be hard to imagine a corporation whose primary aim is to make money.
On the other side of the argument, the economy of the society should not be totally overlooked.
As a matter of fact, if several administrators realized that cooperation between different firms leads to mutual improvement, they would be more likely to continue leaning on one another. Some realistic examples of this are posters and trusts which help to avoid the monopoly of one single company.
In conclusion, I am entirely convinced that, even if it is deeply important for corporation to help their members to collaborate, the economic side of the argument should not be left aside, but it should be used as a way to make cooperation even stronger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | rookobay | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Ifthekhar | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Dinesh4518 | 67 | view |
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 70
- Write about the following topic Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Psychologists have known for many years that colour can affect how people feel For this reason attention should be given to colour schemes when decorating places such as office 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- One increasingly popular policy for promoting renewable energy is a feed in tariff Under such a policy investors on any scale from large corporations to individual homeowners produce their own energy from solar panels installed on their property Electrici 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89075630252 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96221632844 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2756200843 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193604071107 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559934383276 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356216281822 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788674469181 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370513757141 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.