Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts
In past arts and culture had a significant value among people and numerous people thrived towards pursuing it. However, after world war most of the countries were left devastated and left poor. Consequently, mankind realised the value of the money and found that education in scientific fields could earn them money. In this process of urbanization and development, many of us forgot the value of art and culture. I agree with the author that government should help in the upliftment of arts. Since, it provides us the knowledge about our culture, civilization and our moral values.
To begin with, arts has always occupied a significant place in our heart. However, it is so devastating most us forgot the value of art and culture. While we were climbing the steps of development. Now, as we have reached suffcient urbanization, have time to look back what we lost in this process. To regain our cultural and moral values government should adopt effective ways in which we can reach a significant amount of people. For instance, recently authorities have used social media as medium to reach people and provided sufficient funds to universities for inclusion of arts as a subject and build many auditoriums to advocate the exhibition of it.
Additionally, we have to consider that while providing funds we need to be objective and disinterested towards the art form. Let people decide what they like to opt. For instance recently the authorities in power have decided to fund those movies which represent how magnificient their party and make people believe that they are the best representative that people could get in this era.
Lastly, while some people still have objections on the idea of funding since, art is believed to be free corruption and depravity, Since, it represents our morals and culture, that people seek to learn and follow to lead an ideal life. However, if government provides funds to them then people in authorative could corrupt their minds with money and people will get avarious and they would move towards corruption like others.
To sum up, It is necessary for the government to now think about arts and culture. It should seek all the prominent ways in which it could attract locals towards it. However, along with providing funding is should be caveat about its spending of money and allow corruption to get into it and also be dispassionate towards all the art forms, not seek any personal benefit from it.
- "Unlike great thinkers and great artists, the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise." 50
- It is dangerous to trust only intelligence. 16
- "The purpose of education should be to create an academic environment that is separate from the outside world. This kind of environment is ideal because it allows students to focus on important ideas without being held back by practical concerns. 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 50
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...us forgot the value of art and culture. While we were climbing the steps of developme...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 205, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
.... However, along with providing funding is should be caveat about its spending of ...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot seek any personal benefit from it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, lastly, look, so, still, then, while, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03658536585 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72016398183 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1641712317 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297349013102 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884579581005 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699724002837 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179873739225 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356889781661 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.