Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp

Essay topics:

Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

The statement mentions that some people believe that technology takes our chances to interact with others while other people believe that technology can make more connection between people. I agree that technology renovation provides unlimited communication ways between people.
First, technology brings many opportunities to everybody to make connections to the whole world. Imagine a girl who lives and works in Los Angeles, but her whole family members live in Arizona. She is able to keep connection with her family by using easy and fast communication ways such as internet or flight. For instance, she can easily take a plan only for few hours to see her parents. Furthermore, she can use FaceTime to see her family and talk to them, which is an easier way than booking a flight. In addition, this girl can send her photos or voice to her family at any time by using email or Facebook.
Additionally, people are capable to use modernization to have easier connections in a professional world. Consider a Dietitian who lives in Sacramento, but she is looking for a job in a nursing home in Orange County. She might not be able to go to the multiple job interviews in Orange County because of time and money consuming, but with technology like Zoom, she has an opportunity to talk to the manager for a job interview. This Dietitian can even search online for her favorite place to live and have a FaceTime with her new roommate to see the place.
On the contrary, some people believe that technology revolutions are reducing children or young people’s contacts with others, which can be true sometimes. However, even in these cases there are ways to make connections conceivable. For instance, ten years old boy who is interested to play video games will not have enough chance to interact to his family, his classmates, or even his friends. However, this boy’s parent can invite their son’s friends to their home to interact with each other and play video games at the same time. Another way to make connection with their boy is to ask him to talk about his favorite video games or go to online playing centers and have family dinner outside after that.
In conclusion, today people in different parts of the World are able to make more connections easily with each other than before by using technology.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-15 guozhishan 66 view
2024-04-12 Zahid6400 50 view
2023-12-19 woojin 33 view
2023-12-19 woojin 33 view
2023-08-26 SanjanaB 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Fariba.O :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86111111111 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69163372375 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492424242424 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6242386412 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.944444444 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323220971523 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104746888617 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998697636556 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200962951075 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114692345899 0.0667264976115 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.