Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
The statement claims that some people believe that technology reduces the human interaction and opportunities, on the other hand others people believe that it provides new and better experiences in communication and connect with others. I agree with the statement that claims that technology provides us with better ways to communicate and connect with others insofar as technological advancement make very easy to connect the people. It made possible to contact other part of world quickly and in very comfort ways. Technological advancement also made easier to share ideas and research and made the world to global village. However, technological advancement reduces the direct human interaction. Due to industrial automation and machine learning, in every year significant numbers of workers lost their jobs and it reduce the opportunities because of automation.
One compelling argument in favor on my position is technological advancement make very easy to contact with others people. Due to technological advancement, geographical location can not affect in communication. People can contact easily using different ways. For example, people can contact very easily using social media apps like messanger, whatsapp, imo, and others and it is free of cost.
Another argument is technology provide very comfort and easy ways to share the ideas and innovation and every innovation made globaly available. So using technology, anyone can do research and can get better solution that can help the nations. For example, due to technological advancement, now every research papers are available in different journals and one can easily read this research by downloading the paper. So a person did innovation can read the worlds all people very easily. Additionally, the lower income countries can use different simulation apps for doing research that are provided by the different research institutions so that they can contribute in research and innovation. This is possible for the technology.
Moreover, Using video metting like zoom, google meat, skype, anyone can complete metting with others also join in his class.
However, technological advancement reduces human interaction directly. Due to technological upgration, no ones need to communicate and connect face to face and this downgrade our social value and morality. For technology, industrial automation and machine learning are available everywhere that reduces the job opportunities significantly. Machine can do all works in very precious ways that was done by man before. So it increase the rate of unployment.
In conclusion, technological advancement make easy and comfortable to connect and communicate with others and it play a crucial role today's advancement. Nonetheless, technology reduces the human interaction and the social and moral values. It reduces the social relationship and one of the main reason of loosing jobs. But we can not avoid the technolog todays. So every person should balance the social relationship and morality and make adaptive with technology like learn machine learning, data science, and industrial automation. Because although technology reduces the today's jobs, it also creates different futuristic jobs. So people should learn how to adapt to technology.
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning 75
- The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The line graph shows the population size birth rate an death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 819, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...mbers of workers lost their jobs and it reduce the opportunities because of automation...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on. One compelling argument in favor on my position is technological advancement...
^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...ways that was done by man before. So it increase the rate of unployment. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 114, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'plays'?
Suggestion: plays
...nect and communicate with others and it play a crucial role todays advancement. None...
^^^^
Line 6, column 475, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to machine'
Suggestion: to machine
...ake adaptive with technology like learn machine learning, data science, and industrial ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2769.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60526315789 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07922684372 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433198380567 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 896.4 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.6074462478 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4827586207 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0344827586 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31034482759 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421427240757 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109146870059 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103576796395 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21011115468 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12272522333 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.