Teacher s salaries should be based on their students performance

Essay topics:

Teacher's salaries should be based on their students performance

What do you think, should teacher’s salaries be based on student academic performance? Some people might argue that the performance of students be evaluated to determine how much teachers get paid, but others would argue that student academic performance should not factor in when determining how much to pay the teachers. After weighing the evidence, it is clear that student academic performance should not be used to measure how much teachers deserves to get paid.
A fundamental argument that may favour the case that student academic performance be used to determine teacher salaries is that, the teachers would be extra motivated to work, to teach students better because they know their salaries is on the line, which could in theory result into better performance by the students.
However, notwithstanding the foregoing argument that favours the case that pupil academic performance should be measured to determine what to pay teachers, if the teachers push the students too much, it could yield negative effects. For example, consider a teacher generally known for his/her short temper, then this policy of considering students performances before paying teachers comes into action, when such teacher pushes the students to do better and the student does not respond, it could frustrate the severe effort of the teacher, and cause the teacher to channel anger towards such student, resulting in the students been unhappy at school, and getting depressed.
Another example is that, when students are pushed too hard by their teachers, they could respond in an even cynical manner, by failing on purpose. For example, consider college kids pushed by their professors to do better, they would love nothing more than to unionise and fail on purpose, just to get back at their teacher.
Lastly, this policy would certainly result in teachers been unhappy, for them, it would mean their work is under constant scrutiny. In such cases, it could possibly develop a toxic environment, for the students, and for the teacher, therefore impeding learning.
In conclusion, I believe the students academic performance should not be used as a measure of how much to pay teachers. The points stated above are exception examples of why students performances should not used to determine how much to pay teachers.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-18 wopona8219 50 view
2022-07-07 sally_tt 16 view
2022-05-14 _ashmita.upadhyay_ 50 view
2022-03-24 Saugat Basnet 58 view
2021-08-17 liaison421 83 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... students be evaluated to determine how much teachers get paid, but others would arg...
^^^^
Line 1, column 433, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...mance should not be used to measure how much teachers deserves to get paid. A funda...
^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...er constant scrutiny. In such cases, it could possibly develop a toxic environment, for the st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 207, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...of why students performances should not used to determine how much to pay teachers. ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, may, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25675675676 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67439363225 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489189189189 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.4204447514 60.3974514979 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.083333333 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5174236348 0.243740707755 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228157563525 0.0831039109588 275% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141048062808 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274865128719 0.150359130593 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133944900396 0.0667264976115 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.