Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Education is one of the important pillar for the growth of humanity. Students, teachers and institutions form the crux of this. Teachers' are meant to impart knowledge to students and are the vital cog of this system. However, there has been a heated debate over the their remuneration. The prompt says that teachers' salaries should be impacted by students' performance. In my opinion, I disagree with it due to the following three reasons.
To begin with, not all students are same and some may end up not progressing to the next year inspite of teachers' added efforts. To illustrate, consider a professor of an elite college who has years of experience. A bunch of students, who are admitted may not be up to the standards of the professor. The professor may put additional efforts and take extra classes to make sure the students are well prepared. But, the students get involved in illicit activities, not concentrating on studies and end up failing in the subject. In this scenario, even though the professor gave his best to help the students, the students would be responsible for not getting promoted. The above example illustrates, how student performance cannot be the sole criteria to consider a teacher's salary.
Further, a teacher is involved in multiple activities apart from teaching. They are involved in research and development, working with industry experts to improve the current technology, giving back to the society by performing volunteering work, etc. Professors and teachers contribute immense amount of their time in preparing the next generation tools. For example, a professor working in a leading university has teamed up with leading technology experts to develop 5G. The outcome of which would help enable data transfer at a mind boggling rate. However, the professor may not concentrate much on teaching students, rather just cover minimum requirements to make sure he contributes to the development of 5G. In this scenario, though the professor is working to make the world better and bring laurels to his university, his minor contribution towards students' academics may result in him getting less dues than he deserves.
To add further, one might argue that if a student doesn't perform well, then the primary person to be questioned will be the teacher. It's his fundamental duty to make sure that the student is well equipped to cross the hurdle. However, one can't attribute the teachers as the sole person responsible for the students' failure. There are multiple factors, such as the students' family, his friend circle, his interest in doing the studies, etc. All these contribute towards a students' success or failure, not just a teacher.
To conclude, a student performing academically well definitely shows the caliber of both student and teacher. If a teacher is found guilty of not doing his duty, then he should be remunerated accordingly. But a teacher should be considered for multiple factors like research, contribution to society, impact, etc to finalize his salary, not just the academic performance of his students!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | batterylow_123 | 30 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | LauraTing | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | tomlee0205 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | truonval | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | omkarraj | 66 | view |
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- QUESTION Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 76
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general well being of all its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing an 58
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...er, there has been a heated debate over the their remuneration. The prompt says that teac...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...teachers salaries should be impacted by students performance. In my opinion, I disagree ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 766, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...nnot be the sole criteria to consider a teachers salary. Further, a teacher is involv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 904, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun dues is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nts academics may result in him getting less dues than he deserves. To add furthe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ther, one might argue that if a student doesnt perform well, then the primary person t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...n to be questioned will be the teacher. Its his fundamental duty to make sure that ...
^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ipped to cross the hurdle. However, one cant attribute the teachers as the sole pers...
^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... as the sole person responsible for the students failure. There are multiple factors, su...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...There are multiple factors, such as the students family, his friend circle, his interest...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...es, etc. All these contribute towards a students success or failure, not just a teacher....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, apart from, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2577.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16432865731 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88221362722 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51503006012 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5831051926 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0357142857 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8214285714 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213340211119 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618925721508 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040873199594 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134554826808 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030204430014 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.